Talk:Tropical Storm Miriam (2006)

Tropical Storm Miriam (2006) was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 23, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed
April 12, 2010	Good article reassessment	Delisted

Current status: Delisted good article

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tropical Storm Miriam (2006)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hi! I will be conducting the GA review of this article, and I should have the full review up within a few hours. Dana boomer (talk) 18:33, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
"Initially, wind shear sheared..." Is there any way to reword this? "Shear sheared" just sounds odd to me.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

I had one minor comment on the prose, but this in itself is not enough to prevent the article from being promoted to GA status. Therefore, I am passing the article. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Dana boomer (talk) 19:02, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 19:33, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm delisting this article from GA status as I believe it doesn't meet notability requirements. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 19:10, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]