Talk:Tuvalu at the 2008 Summer Olympics/GA1
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Kees08 (talk · contribs) 19:07, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
| |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | ||
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. |
| |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). |
There are no citations in the first paragraph of Background. --Added one, fine now? Don't see how it can really be sourced Citation for national record? Done under table.
Cite the qualification information. | |
2c. it contains no original research. | ||
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | ||
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. |
Any quotes from the athletes? | |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | ||
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | ||
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | ||
7. Overall assessment. |
For the population of the island, make sure you use the population from the year the games were held, and note in the sentence that is the year you are using. Done Not same year, but pretty close.
- Kees08 Sorry for the delay. Done all. For the year of publication thing, I don't understand what you mean. It's just common reference style when you don't know the exact date. Dat GuyTalkContribs 13:53, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
- @DatGuy:Any qualification info or quotes? As for the date, if the source does not say when it is published, we cannot just add a date in there even if we are reasonably sure of when that is. Kees08 (talk) 21:48, 18 March 2017 (UTC)