Talk:Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

No mention of the Blue Rose case in plot synopsis (Spoiler?)

Dear wikipedians,

There is no mention of Lil, or the Blue Rose case, in the plot summary. Since this particular arc looms large in The Return, might the inclusion of a sentence or two about it here serve as an incentive for curious newcomers, whose first exposure is season 3, to explore Fire Walk With Me, an excellent work in its own right, for themselves? Perhaps something along the lines of:

The pair are informed about their new assignment through a woman named Lil. On her lapel is a tiny, artificial blue rose, clearly symbolic of something; but when Sam asks, Chet simply replies, "But I can't tell you about that."

Thank you, Formless Lifespan (talk) 07:21, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned references in Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "ny":

• From Lara Flynn Boyle: Crouch, Ian (October 7, 2014). "Some Thoughts on the Planned Return of Twin Peaks". The New Yorker. New York City: Condé Nast. Retrieved March 31, 2018.
• From Twin Peaks: Crouch, Ian (October 7, 2014). "Some Thoughts on the Planned Return of Twin Peaks". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on February 20, 2017. Retrieved February 19, 2017.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 06:13, 20 December 2021 (UTC)