Talk:U.S. Route 285

U.S. Roads: U.S. Highways Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	U.S. Highways
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Relavance

What relavance does the Great Sand Dunes have to US285? 285 is way further west, and the Sand Dunes if associated with any road is Colorado State Highway 17, or US 160. Those are the only roads with access points to the Sand Dunes, or what about CO 150, which is the ONLY road that actually accesses the National Park. Is there any reason to associate these two? I'm feeling like the reference should be deleted, can anyone give me reason not to?

Throughthelens 23:41, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

History notes

State highway numbers

TX: 82, 192, 17
NM: 2, 74 (116 until 1926)
CO: 163, 17, (US 450), 15, 8

The only auto trail US 285 follows was a branch of the Ozark Trails south of Roswell.

Denver junction list

This article contained a junction list for a short section of the route that is a freeway in the Denver area. I moved that list to Talk:U.S. Route 285 in Colorado until a state page can be created. Fortguy (talk) 16:45, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on U.S. Route 285. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:26, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]