Talk:USB Attached SCSI

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the USB Attached SCSI article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing: Software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Device list?

Is there any list of devices that support UASP? Some googling revealed that Thermaltake BlacX 5G (dock for SATA devices) supports it and some Asus and Gigabyte motherboards. Is there some software to check if controller and device support UASP or not? --Xerces8 (talk) 18:22, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dell 1TB portable external hard drive USB 3.0 PDA1000B reported here as having supporting UAS. --Xerces8 (talk) 17:28, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is a list of devices at http://event.asus.com/mb/2010/The_Best_USB3_Experience/The_UASP_For_USB3.0.htm --Xerces8 (talk) 20:20, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh no there isn't 86.153.133.193 (talk) 16:55, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

uas devices

amazon sells usb to sata hard drive dongles that attach and report as uasp, and even say uasp on the packaging.

seagate stgx2000400 reports as uasp also. the whole family of rotating large storage drives that drive is a part of are all uasp.

ubuntu support

shouldn't we pull references to ubuntu support being garbage? says ubuntu 11, what are we on ubuntu 20 now? things change fast especially with technology and we shouldn't be reporting technological shortcomings on wikipedia, that should be saved for wiki.ubuntu.org not here.