Talk:USS Cushing (DD-55)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Good articleUSS Cushing (DD-55) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starUSS Cushing (DD-55) is part of the O'Brien class destroyers series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 31, 2009Good article nomineeListed
June 17, 2009Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article
WikiProject Ships (Rated GA-class)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.WikiProject icon
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 
WikiProject Military history (Rated GA-Class)
MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality assessment scale.

WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008[edit]

Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 15:18, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:USS Cushing (DD-55)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Below is my review:

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
No issues here. The article is already a GA. - DSachan (talk) 11:07, 31 May 2009 (UTC)