Talk:USS Roanoke (1855)

USS Roanoke (1855) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 11, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed

Military history: Maritime / North America / United States / American Civil War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	American Civil War task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:USS Roanoke (1855)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: HueSatLum (talk · contribs) 02:36, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Standardize month abbreviations (e.g. Mar ↔ March)
[[President]] → [[President of Nicaragua|President]]
"Pilothouse" (or "Pilot-house") seems to be the proper spelling.
Add {{convert}} for "nine inches" and "one-inch plates"
- All done, thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 07:37, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
Minor prose issues cleaned up above
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
I'm assuming that some refs are for entire paragraphs.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It's hard to be biased with this topic
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Two appropriate public domain images
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Nicely done. Hue Sat Lum 23:40, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]