Talk:USS Sargent Bay
Appearance
![]() | USS Sargent Bay has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: January 2, 2020. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:USS Sargent Bay/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 05:58, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Criteria
[edit]1. Well-written
- Prose is clear, concise, and understandable, with proper spelling and grammar
- Lead
- Layout
Possibly The section for USS Sargent Bay#Construction is only two sentences long. It would be good to expand this section, although I understand that may not be entirely possible. This section could also be consolidated.
Done
- Links
Partly done Some article links, such as Operation Magic Carpet are linked in the article multiple times. Generally links should only be used in the first appearance of the topic in an article (not counting the infobox). Also, the redlink to William Theodore Rassieur should probably be dealt with.
Done
- Buzzwords
- Fiction
not an issue with this topic
- Lists
not applicable
2. Verifiable
- List of references properly formatted
Partly done It looks like refs 5 and 8 should be consolidated into a single named ref, since they appear to be quoting the same page of the same book.
Done
- Inline citations from reliable sources
Partly done. Can you add inline citations to the various dates in the infobox for verifiability? The dates are cited in the article so it's not a big deal, but having citations there would be nice.
- Content cited in article, not big deal.
- No original research
(none that I can detect).
- No COPYVIO
I tested several sentences throughout the article, and they came up clean.
3. Broad in coverage
- Covers main aspects
Design, construction, and service history properly detailed.
- Stays focused on topic
4. Neutral
5. Stable
6. Illustrated if possible
- Media tagged for copyright details
All media tagged as public domain.
- Media relevant
- @Hog Farm: I've responded to your points. Stikkyy t/c 06:50, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
- Issues mentioned have been addressed. Good job, User:Stikkyy.
- @Hog Farm: I've responded to your points. Stikkyy t/c 06:50, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Warfare good articles
- GA-Class Ships articles
- All WikiProject Ships pages
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class military aviation articles
- Military aviation task force articles
- GA-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- GA-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- GA-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- GA-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles