Talk:Ukrainian Village, Chicago

Illinois Low‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chicago

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Boundary Correction

Its boundaries are Division Street to the north, Kinzie Street to the south, Western Avenue to the west, and Damen Avenue to the east.

According to this image, the correct southern boundary is Kinzie, not Chicago. I live south of Chicago and there are plenty of Ukrainian Village street banners and most real estate sites I've come across label many addresses south of Chicago and North of Kinzie as Ukrainian Village. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.173.5.96 (talk) 18:45, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

New Hot Spot?

Ask around Chicago and you'll find that Ukrainian Village is the new "hot place" to move in the city for young adults. It's not too expensive, safe, and popular (at least right now). If you know of any sources for this online (mine are just word of mouth around the bars) please post em' here for we can add this tidbit to the article. Thanks! Dann3131 (talk) 19:57, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know, but within the Ukrainian community I know rents are often advertised in Ukrainian only in order to keep the neighborhood's historical character. A losing battle? Hope not. There already IS a Wicker Park.Faustian (talk) 23:37, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merger

The following discussion is a concluded merger discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was No Consensus: (1 for, 1 against). No merger should take place as a result of this nomination. TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 01:06, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I oppose because they are different things a Historic District in a neighborhood should have its own page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TonyTheTiger (talk • contribs) 20:21, 12 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Merge - I'm not sure how they are different. To my understanding, Ukrainian Village, Chicago and Ukrainian Village District are one and the same entity. The neighborhood/district was given special status by the mayor, so to draw an artificial distinction is unnecessary, unless I am missing something. Further, whether a historical district in a neighborhood should have its page is a whole other issue. On the other hand, props on the work you're doing with landmarks in Chicago. --Riurik^(discuss) 21:50, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is a concluded merger discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.