Talk:Universal prescriptivism
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image copyright problem with Image:RMHare.jpg
[edit]The image Image:RMHare.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --02:59, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
This article is a disgrace. Virtually everything wrong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.132.189.181 (talk) 08:12, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the comment, how can we start to fix it? Skomorokh 08:16, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
This is a horrific article, someone seriously needs to change this, why not just replace the whole philosophy section of wikipedia with a link to the Stanford encyclopaedia, since it is of a far greater quality?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.184.137.92 (talk)