Talk:Urban thermal plume

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Climate change

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

It is requested that a meteorological diagram or diagrams be included in this article to improve its quality. Specific illustrations, plots or diagrams can be requested at the Graphic Lab.
For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images.

Not relevant to this page

I removed this material:

"In some reports, aerial carbon dioxide has increased by as much as 22% over the past hundred years. It is now said to approach 390 parts per million (0.039%) of the atmosphere. In accumulating this data, a very large proportion of measurements have been made along the Atlantic and Pacific seaboards.^[1] We know that both the Atlantic and Pacific have become warmer in this period, and that, because carbon dioxide is less soluble in warmer water, both these oceans have discharged carbon dioxide. Thus we can not tell how much of the increase in aerial carbon dioxide is due to oceanic warming, and how much is due to burning fossil fuels. In any case, because CO₂ only contributes 9% - 26% to the overall atmospheric Greenhouse effect, the impact of a 22% increase in CO₂ will be only 2% - 5.7%."

This isn't relevant to the discussion on this page, and I found it confusing when reading, so I took it out and put in a sentence to introduce the idea of urban thermal plumes affecting arctic sea ice. Let's keep the global warming debate stuff on its own pages where it belongs. Megalophias (talk) 23:37, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Low signal-to-noise ratio

This article seems to take a lot of words to say very little indeed. I learned the following bits of information:

Urban thermal plumes exist, but not very much is known about them
Unlike thermal plumes from chimneys, they are difficult to model
We cannot determine what effect urban thermal plumes have on natural wind patterns because we can't turn them off (this seems like rather a lazy argument, as we can still get time series data)
Climate change skeptics like urban thermal plumes because they provide an alternative to carbon dioxide as a culprit for global warming
In particular, the loss of arctic ice cover has been blamed on urban thermal plumes.

I was particularly impressed by the ratio of references to concrete facts in the article (which seems to be tending towards infinity). --Specrat (talk) 02:43, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ www.nasa.gov

[1] www.nasa.gov

[1]