Talk:User experience

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2013; 2014; 2020;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Computing: Software / Websites Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Websites (assessed as Top-importance).

Human–Computer Interaction (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human–Computer Interaction, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Human–Computer InteractionWikipedia:WikiProject Human–Computer InteractionTemplate:WikiProject Human–Computer InteractionHuman–Computer Interaction articles

Marketing & Advertising High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Systems Mid‑importance

	Systems science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the field of Systems engineering.

Intro still confusing and unclear - A suggestion

The intro of any Wikipedia article should start with the most general and simplest definition. The current one is still a confusing jumble, but ends with a fairly useful simplification. Here is an improved version of that to start the intro with. Clearer? Aspects like emotion and attitude are just two of many included in what follows.

User experience (UX) is a person's experience of and interaction with a particular product, system or service. It includes etc... Majvr (talk) 21:17, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Summarizing (or even quoting) from at least one authoritative source is essential. --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 21:21, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your guidance Hipal/Ronz. I just slightly paraphrased the perfectly clear ISO standard definition quoted in the Definition section already. What I propose then is to replace the whole jumbled intro with a summary of that Definition section, as follows.

User experience (UX) is all of a person's perceptions and responses that result from the use or anticipated use of a product, system or service^[1]. It includes all the users' emotions, beliefs, preferences, perceptions, physical and psychological responses, behaviors and accomplishments that occur before, during and after use.

That's it. OK? Majvr (talk) 11:38, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. Why not reference the 2019 version? --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 16:01, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ International Organization for Standardization (2009). Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 210: Human-centered design for interactive systems (formerly known as 13407). ISO F±DIS 9241-210:2009.

Developer experience

13:29, January 6, 2022 - «Undid revision 1063969079 by Alexander Davronov talk) reverted addition with multiple errors»

@Cerebral726: What errors? Why not to fix them first?

AXONOV (talk) ⚑ 23:09, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was the second person to revert that addition. It isn't the responsibility of other editors to fix mistakes you add if you repeatedly add them. It might be better if you start a discussion on this talk page with the additions you want to make so these errors can be worked through before they are in the article. The issues were mainly grammatical and style errors, as the previous editor who reverted your addition noted. --Cerebral726 (talk) 13:59, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Cerebral726: Are you going to ignore my question above? You seen WP:FIXFIRST?
I was the second person to revert that addition.… ← This justifies nothing. The previous editor was banned because he was a long term abuser nicknamed as WP:BKFIP and whose edits weren't genuinely constructive. He basically made spurious and baseless accusations against me in an unrelated article about "mistakes" with the same nonsential rhetoric about "start on talk page". That's not how it works here. You also should be aware that the text I've added in fact, only partially mine. I've copied it from here: [10:52, September 19, 2021]. AXONOV (talk) ⚑ 19:42, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

First off, you should try to be a little less incendiary with your approach to communicating with another editor, I am not acting in a way intended to upset you. I reverted the addition because the mistakes were not minor. I found the addition difficult to understand as it was written. I am not trying to disparage your addition, it is clear you are acting in good faith, but there are numerous grammatical and content errors. Regardless of why the other person was reverting your addition, I saw it as a valid removal. I am adding back in your addition with several fixes. --Cerebral726 (talk) 19:59, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine. Regards. AXONOV (talk) ⚑ 20:09, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relation with the customer experience wikipedia page

Why is there no relationship between this page and the customer experience wikipedia page? The customer experience page has a section on user experience but doesn't point to this article. In fact, the customer experience article has a huge warning about its quality. I suspect some of those arguments apply to this page as well. Is it worth reconciling these two pages? 2A01:4B00:AD02:DB00:E553:6AC7:5BAA:66FB (talk) 22:39, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - SP24 - Sect 201 - Thu

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 March 2024 and 4 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Zefeng jing (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Zefeng jing (talk) 18:05, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] International Organization for Standardization (2009). Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 210: Human-centered design for interactive systems (formerly known as 13407). ISO F±DIS 9241-210:2009.

[1]