Talk:Vadda Ghalughara

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Vadda Ghalughara article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Sikhism

This article is part of WikiProject Sikhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Sikhism. Please participate by editing the article, or visit the project page for more details on the projects.

Guidelines: Manual of Style - Naming conventionsSikhismWikipedia:WikiProject SikhismTemplate:WikiProject SikhismSikhism articles

India: Punjab / History Start‑class Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Punjab portal This article is supported by WikiProject Punjab (India) (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).

A member of the Guild of Copy Editors, PaintedCarpet, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on 30 May 2014. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining!
Please address the following issues as well as any other cleanup tags before re-tagging this article with copyedit: Article should be reviewed by an expert on the subject and checked for neutrality first. Sections may need rewriting, which is beyond the scope of a simple copy edit.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 June 2020 and 2 August 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jasleenbghuman.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 12:13, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

POV Check

Generally, the factual outline seems reasonable. However, the POV seems to be clearly biased in favor of a particular political/sectarian reading of history. This bias is reinforced in the sources used, all of which upon at least cursory examination are highly partial to one particular viewpoint. IronSheep (talk) 04:47, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The POV of this article is an issue. It sets it up as Muslims V Sikhs, while it seems to be a conflict by an invading Nation. Which happen to be Muslims. These people who happen to be Muslim did not kill the Sikhs because they were Sikhs. Just like in Darfur was there a religious motive (both side shared the same religion). So we cannot confuse religion in a conflict over land and conquest.Same is true for Indira's attack on the Sikh temple, it was not a religious issue.--Halqh حَلَقَة הלכהሐላቃህ (talk) 11:50, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ITS MISSING A WHOLE POINT ON HOW DID THE SIKHS THEN TAKE BACK HARI MANDIR SAHIB???? THERES NO ACCOUNT OF IT ON THE PAGE, DOESNT MAKE SENSE, THIS ARTICLE NEEDS CLEANING UP AND PUT IN CHRONILOGICAL ORDER OF EVENTS. VERY CONFUSING!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.6.109.124 (talk) 15:05, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

After holocaust

The flow of this article seems abrupt; a brief section on the later events and activities of the Sikhs after the holocaust would be helpful. -- Roadahead ★ 22:50, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Holocaust (a proper noun reference) is a historical definition in particular to the events of Nazi Germany. This article msut renamed Ghallugarha for clarity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 113.11.48.195 (talk) 13:30, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article name

What is the preferred transliteration scheme for Punjabi ? In particular, should ਘੱਲੂਘਾਰਾ be transliterated into English as:

Ghalooghaaraa
Ghalughara
something else ?

Ditto, for the article Chhotaa Ghallooghaaraa. Abecedare (talk) 20:34, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move 14 June 2015

Sikh holocaust of 1762 → Sikh genocide of 1762 – The word "holocaust" is too opinionated. There's no reason to use the more straight forward word "genocide". Durranina (talk) 17:52, 14 June 2015 (UTC) -> Support. Holocaust should be reserved for the WWII persecution. We're not calling all genocides 'holocaust'. Also, 30 thousand people? Not sure if this is genocide or 'normal' invasion practices. 77.167.250.126 (talk) 20:13, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Citations for holocaust,[1][2][3] it is referred as massacre or holocaust, but holocaust is more common. Raymond3023 (talk) 04:08, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Sikh holocaust of 1762" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Sikh holocaust of 1762. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 28#Sikh holocaust of 1762 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 11:45, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Sikh genocide of 1762.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:53, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]