Talk:Van Morrison: No Surrender/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 21:13, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Checking against GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- I changed the wiki-link to the Daily Express, so that it refers directly to Daily Express, it is rarely referred to as just The Express. Feel free to disagree, I don't think it is a Ga issue.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- The article is adequately referenced, I assume good faith for off-line sources.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Very thorough
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Neutral and balanced
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- And another one, if only all reviews were as easy as this. Congratulations on your writing style and mastery of the elements of writing a good artcile. Passed. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:45, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
Thank you very much! Cirt (talk) 00:20, 17 January 2010 (UTC)