Jump to content

Talk:Verge (cryptocurrency)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Moved from article

[edit]

Matrail added by Jay.tanwar in this edit - should be presented here rather than in mainspace.

Articles published on MindGeek Partnership with Verge

  1. http://www.businessinsider.com/pornhub-begins-accepting-cryptocurrency-verge-2018-4
  2. https://www.wired.com/story/pornhub-verge-cryptocurrency
  3. https://www.pcmag.com/news/360485/pornhub-brazzers-now-accept-cryptocurrency
  4. http://metro.co.uk/2018/04/17/pornhub-lets-smut-fans-cover-tracks-making-payments-using-cryptocurrency-verge-7475296/?ito=desktop.article.share.bottom.twitter
  5. https://www.wired.com/story/pornhub-verge-cryptocurrency/
  6. http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2018/04/pornhub-accepts-cryptocurrency-now/
  7. https://thenextweb.com/hardfork/2018/04/17/pornhub-verge-cryptocurrency-partner
  8. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/the-future-has-come-pornhub-now-accepts-verge-cryptocurrency-to-keep-current-with-its-communitys-payment-preferences-300631288.html
  9. https://ethereumworldnews.com/world-famous-pornhub-now-accepts-verge-xvg-for-subscriptions/
  10. http://fortune.com/2018/04/17/verge-pornhub-mindgeek-cryptocurrency-brazzers/
  11. https://www.coindesk.com/pornhub-adds-crypto-payment-option-verge-token/
  12. https://www.forbes.com/sites/curtissilver/2018/04/17/pornhub-partners-with-verge-cryptocurrency-shifting-the-future-of-porn-payments/#38ac663524b5
  13. https://mashable.com/2018/04/17/pornhub-verge-cryptocurrency/#PkgB3kH_.ZOA
  14. https://www.theverge.com/2018/4/17/17244916/pornhub-cryptocurrency-verge-xvg
  15. https://sg.finance.yahoo.com/news/world-biggest-porn-pornhub-partners-170909521.html
  16. https://futurism.com/pornhub-accepts-verge-cryptocurrency/

--Elmidae (talk · contribs) 17:05, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sections: Privacy, Wraith Protocol

[edit]

These sections had numerous issues:

  • Weren't written in third person
  • Weren't written with authoritative wikipedia "style"
  • Basically unsourced, citing sources that mentioned text in passing but didn't mention the text itself
  • (therefore original research)
  • Information about atomic swaps felt misleading, it hasn't been released, doesn't seem to ever have been planned in Wraith Protocol
  • Privacy section seemed full of fluff and read like advertising
  • Privacy section seemed to go on about Tor unnecessarily
  • Both sections seemed redundant

In light of this, I have basically chucked them and re-written the text in the wikipedia style, fully sourced.

This page may benefit from a history section. The price sentence in the header is really no longer relevant and better suits a history section.

TL;DR: WP:BOLD

Reriksenus (talk) 04:26, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]