Talk:Vermont Route 17

Vermont Route 17 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 16, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed

U.S. Roads: State highways / Vermont Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Topics

U.S. state highways

Locations

Vermont

This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.

This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Article recognition:

	This article was the selected article of the U.S. Roads Portal in October 2008.

GA Review

GA review (see here for criteria)

This is a nice piece of work, but it still has some shortcomings with respect to the good article criteria.

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): - Updated: — master son^{T - C} 19:34, 16 March 2008 (UTC)) b (MoS): - Updated: — master son^{T - C} 19:34, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

distance in 2nd para of History needs to have a convert. Done
"The road was paved between 1936 and 1940" - so the pavement was removed after 1940? Please clear up Done
Lets use {{jct}} in the infobox to keep consistency with the junction list Done
Bold in the history section? Done
- VT F-7 redirects here, thus I have restored the boldface for it. --TMF ^{Let's Go Mets - Stats} 22:26, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Works for me - I'll note that for future reviews. — master son^{T - C} 23:51, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The route description does not detail anything about the NY 910L portion. Since this article focuses partly on it - perhaps there should be some detail in there. Done

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Can we get a map of the route? (not binding to the review) Done
Overall:
Pass/Fail: - Updated: — master son^{T - C} 19:34, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Overall its very good, just these few fixes and we're ready to go, holding until then

— master son^{T - C} 19:09, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Updated - passed

congratulations — master son^{T - C} 19:34, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]