Talk:Vermont Route 289
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Brand New
[edit]I just wrote this, and there is lot to do still, which I will either do later today (when I'm not at work) or if someone else gets to it before then, fine by me! :-D
- Categorization
- Infoboxes - Vermont doesn't have one yet. I'll probably work on that next.
- General Expansion
- REFERENCES - I have those right here.
I hope it's OK though! --Raj Fra 18:33, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
Propose interchange
[edit]The lines in gray have those alignments even begun construction yet. Do we have reliable source say when it will start construction and is it accept. Per WP:ELG any junctions has not yet reach construction phase does not belong on the Exit list. This needs a relialbe source or we have to remove all the jcts with gray background.--Freewayguy (Webmail) 01:02, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
This source is not reliable enough. The lines shade in light gray is only use for the routes in middle of construction. I don't even think they even begun construction yet. The law hasn't pass. Per WP:ELG any junction has not yet or far from meet the phase of construction does not belong on the exit list.--Freewayguy (Webmail) 22:53, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Does the postmile cite show proprose pm in light gray shade, showing plan construction phase? needs to provide evidence.--Freewayguy Talk Contribs 03:15, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Vermont Route 289. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070928010813/http://www.circeis.org/studyteam/studyteamdocuments/NOI-fed-register-041126.pdf to http://www.circeis.org/studyteam/studyteamdocuments/NOI-fed-register-041126.pdf
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070928010820/http://www.circeis.org/documents/open_house_documents/handouts_with_alt22_223/short_list_final.pdf to http://www.circeis.org/documents/open_house_documents/handouts_with_alt22_223/short_list_final.pdf
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20061005062700/http://www.circeis.org:80/index.html to http://www.circeis.org/index.html
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070928010834/http://www.circeis.org/02-2006_MeetingDocs.html to http://www.circeis.org/02-2006_MeetingDocs.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:40, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
- C-Class Interstate Highway System articles
- Mid-importance Interstate Highway System articles
- C-Class Road transport articles
- Mid-importance Road transport articles
- Interstate Highway System articles
- C-Class Vermont road transport articles
- Mid-importance Vermont road transport articles
- Vermont road transport articles
- C-Class U.S. road transport articles
- Mid-importance U.S. road transport articles
- U.S. road transport articles