This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
It's immediately obvious that by bringing up Ichthyoconodon in that paragraph, it is implicitly included in the subsequent discussion of aquatic depositional environments not necessarily implying an aquatic lifestlye. Unless there is a subsequent reference which explicitly explains why their reasoning does not apply to Ichthyoconodon, the fact that Kielan-Jaworowska et al. said that Sigogneau-Russell's reasoning for an aquatic Ichthyoconodon was flawed remains relevant. Ornithopsis (talk) 15:57, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
She addresses Astroconodon, and even then notes a possible difference between freshwater strata. In retrospect her reasoning is flawed given Yanoconodon and Liaoconodon. Finally this mentions aerial and arboreal Mesozoic mammal ecologies seperately, though it does not bother to clarify it further, so I didn't use it.
