Talk:WDDX

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Internet (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Computing (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

I did not want to edit this page without consulting the community that created it first, but isn't WDDX like JSON more than AJAX? I mean AJAX is a means of transporting data. Better put, AJAX is all about the transmission of the data NOT the Data itself. Whereas WDDX, like JSON seems to be all about the data that is transmitted. Both should be able to be transmitted using AJAX. Am I wrong on this fact?

By User:Osiebrown 13:16, 12 February 2008

That's true, indeed people using javascript/WDDX to exchange data still use AJAX, but replace json with wddx. I'll fix that. MagicalTux (talk) 10:56, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on WDDX. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Question? Archived sources still need to be checked

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:22, 31 March 2016 (UTC)