This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of radio stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Radio StationsWikipedia:WikiProject Radio StationsTemplate:WikiProject Radio StationsRadio station articles
I have removed the image that was being used in the infobox as the radio station's logo because the image was NOT, in fact, the logo. You can't crop something out of a website's masthead and call that the logo. The logo was included in the crop, yes, but the actual logo would be the mark against a transparent background, not the mark against the pink background. This is easy enough to create, from the crop, in Photoshop, but someone would have to do it (I probably could, but it'll take some time, as I have other priorities to attend to first). --StrikerforceTalkReview me!23:46, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Huh? It's in the WNGY article to identify the station graphically, not in the logo article to illustrate what a dictionary definition of logo is. Why would having no graphic be better than that one? And the article doesn't say "logo" in it: It's a template parameter name that's used because there has to be some name for each parameter, and I doubt anyone wants to type logo_or_technically_something_including_it_until_someone_edits_it.) Has anyone else here seen someone remove a graphic from that infobox position for that reason? --Closeapple (talk) 05:09, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Having seen no other objection, and seeing no other visual representation, I'm returning File:Energy1023 2014 logo.png, however it is described, to the image= parameter of the infobox unless someone can obtain a better copy. (And attempting to crop it is going to leave either a pink shading where the color transition is, or a crop further into the black and green than the logo's creator intended. I'm not sure that's better than just using the brand's apparently approved background. For what it's worth, I did not choose what the cropping, though perhaps the editors of FormatChange.com did. I used the image as given.) --Closeapple (talk) 00:46, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
