Talk:WSDL

Disambig vs redirect discussion

I am for having WSDL as a redirect for the sake of convenience. Anyone who prefers a disambig instead is free to add their comments here. Note that there is already a disambiguation made on top of Web Services Description Language, the only WSDL article that has been created on Wikipedia at the time of this writing. --MinorEdits 08:56, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support in part: There is not a compelling reason to have WSDL (disambiguation) at this time; rather, could use {{Redirect}} to disambiguate to WSDL-FM, which abides by a naming convention mentioned at Wikipedia:WikiProject Radio Stations#Stations with call signs. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:25, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support: I generally prefer disambiguation pages even when we have just two articles. IMO, it will encourage editors of other articles to link to the full and correct article (eg. Web Services Description Language), instead of to WSDL, which will require less maintenance in the future if another definition of "WSDL" arises. Warrens 03:39, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't hurt to have a dab page, but it needn't hog the spotlight. Moved. —Nightst a llion (?) 08:38, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Changed to redirect

Since, four years later, the meaning of WSDL is still used for Web Services Description Language 99.9% of the time, I've nixed the disambig page and put a {{redirect}} note on the main article. ...comments? ~BF izz 18:29, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]