Talk:WURFL

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Telecommunications (Rated C-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
 
WikiProject Computing (Rated C-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 

WALL[edit]

Should we have a separate page/section on WALL? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peterbu (talkcontribs)

That seems like a good idea. I may write that part. Time permitting... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Passani (talkcontribs)

Big parts of this page concentrate on the commercial WURFL offerings and resembles advertisement, more than information that you would expect to see on an encyclopedia. All of these should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.156.13.108 (talk) 14:47, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

There used to be relevant info about WURFL cloud, support for different platforms and integration with proxies and web servers. Someone had removed that, but it definitely belonged here (among other things it is not clear, by the same metrics, why all the stupid discussion about the nuances of the licensing was considered more relevat than what the tool actually is and does). Anyway, it only made sense to undo that removal and re-add the information — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.72.140.160 (talk) 05:11, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

References[edit]

References have been added with citations for some claims. Is this enough to remove the "no references" tag? Sax1johno (talk) 21:12, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Yes. It's now {{Refimprove}}. -- Trevj (talk) 09:48, 29 December 2011 (UTC)