Talk:Waikato Expressway

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Highways: Oceania Low‑importance

	Roads portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Highways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of highways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HighwaysWikipedia:WikiProject HighwaysTemplate:WikiProject HighwaysHighways articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Oceania Highways Task Force.

Hamilton Section

Costs $636m https://www.nzta.govt.nz/projects/waikato-expressway/hamilton/ Older version of exact same link shows old estimate of $974m https://web.archive.org/web/20160601000000*/https://www.nzta.govt.nz/projects/waikato-expressway/hamilton/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.203.247.130 (talk) 04:53, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is no press release that I can find that suggests the project was lowered from $974m to $636m anywhere, either from NZTA or from independent sources. $636m is not a reliable figure. Ajf773 (talk) 04:56, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oh ok, so the official NZTA source for the estimate which has changed from the number you keep stating is just an error? Perhaps you should inform them that their website now says $636m instead of the "correct" $973m. http://www.nzta.govt.nz/assets/projects/waikato-expressway/docs/key-facts-hamilton.pdf https://www.nzta.govt.nz/projects/waikato-expressway/hamilton/ WHY IS NZTA NOT A RELIABLE SOURCE?

The first source you provided is an estimate, the second is a figure that does not correlate with the source I provided on the article page, a press release of the sod turning of the expressway section and its contracted figure. As far as I'm concerned nothing has changed. I may have to write to NZTA to get them to verify their project website. Ajf773 (talk) 05:08, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Leading section updation

Leading section seems a little off now that Hamilton is bypassed. I attempted to make the leading section more correct to its overall information, but it may need some more fixing. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 05:55, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How long is the Expressway?

A description dating back to 2010, when parts were still being investigated, said, "it will be 102km, some 6km shorter than the current State Highway 1". The article says, "101.4 km (63.0 mi) long", but its source only repeats the 102 figure. Google maps says Bombay to the end of the Cambridge bypass is 113km and the old route is 117km. 113 is the total of the distances in the first table, but not in the second table. What are the sources for the tables and are there any better? Johnragla (talk) 15:37, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The expressway starts at Mill Road (exit 471 on SH 1) and ends at Cambridge Road. I got this: [1]. I have no reason to dispute 102km as the full length. Ajf773 (talk) 21:23, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I'd not noticed I'd picked the northbound carriageway at Mill Rd, rather than southbound, but it's still 4km shorter than the old route. Johnragla (talk) 06:16, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Exit list

I updated the exit list to use the modern template. There are three at-grade intersection on the Mercer section near Meremere, these state there are proposals to either close or upgrade these. I have not found any sources confirming these plans. I am tempted to remove from the notes unless sources can be found. Ajf773 (talk) 21:25, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've searched for Spring Hill, Oram and Island Block roads and can't find any current plan to change their SH1 junctions. Johnragla (talk) 05:36, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Me neither, I'll keep this open for a little while longer and see if anyone else knows a bit more. Ajf773 (talk) 10:19, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Exit numbering

As exit numbers are based on the distance from Cape Reinga, do we need an incomplete column showing them, or could it be deleted? If they are shown should there be a citation for each, eg a Google street view of a relevant sign? Johnragla (talk) 17:14, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Those white signs are distance markers from the start of the state highway (in this case Cape Reinga) and I don't have a problem for them used for km/mi distances. Exit numbers, on the other hand, only exist by official signage (Openstreetmap shows them [2]). Unless it has changed in recent years, Exit 477 is the most southbound exit with an exit number. Ajf773 (talk) 09:56, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]