Can we get a Contents Page?

I had put in the contents list as a summary of the questions being covered by the book
the X followed by Y format was an additional attempt to indicate who discussed the question first
I would really like to retain/get-back the contents page detail that I feel is good-to-have here.
But, I refrain from re-inserting it from my earlier edits (appears like I have not quite understood how editing works here)
So, if the experts here feel like listing the contents page for this book, it is present in the edit history (at the very start of this page). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nik.. . (talk • contribs) 05:14, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

X followed by Y

All these "Deepak followed by Leonard" and then "Leonard followed by Deepak" bits aren't really useful are they?

Re: X followed by Y

Yup, totally useless. Deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.180.79.7 (talk) 08:16, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why this book is in category "Pseudoscience literature"?"

This book contain scientific and esoteric view on world - it is not pseudoscience.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.252.21.214 (talk) 18:59, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]