Talk:West End Historic District (Dallas)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dallas-Fort Worth, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Dallas-Fort WorthWikipedia:WikiProject Dallas-Fort WorthTemplate:WikiProject Dallas-Fort WorthDallas-Fort Worth articles

United States: Texas Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chicago

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

conspiracy theorizing

The Warren Commission's Report that Oswald was the lone gunman has not gained widespread acceptance from the American public. A 2003 ABC News poll found that 70% of respondents "suspect a plot" committed the assassination of President Kennedy. [1] In the end, the public did not fully accept the results published by the Warren Commission secret investigations. About 70% to 90% of the American public do not accept some of the basic conclusions of the Warren Commission,[2] and this skepticism was shared by some prominent government officials including those who served on the Warren Commission itself:

Doubts about the Warren Commission's findings were not restricted to ordinary Americans. Well before 1978, President Johnson, Robert Kennedy, and four of the seven members of the Warren Commission all articulated, if sometimes off the record, some level of skepticism about the Commission's basic findings.[3]

History isn't decided by opinion polls.

If you want to dispute the four government investigations, go join the discussion on the JFK assassination articles. This article is not the appropriate forum for disputing this matter. Gamaliel 04:44, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here, let's try this

That's pretty much the same as your last edit. Gamaliel 16:33, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, you see, it is not. So you are saying that it is not said that Oswald shot Kennedy from there? I thought four federal investigations said that.

Very good Gamaliel. I like it, you must be one smart cookie.

NRHP claims

I removed claims in the article that this district is listed on the National Register of Historic Places, including this sentence: "The area bounded by Lamar, Griffin, Wood, Market, and Commerce streets is listed on the National Register of Historic Places." I believe it is not NRHP-listed. There exists an NRHP-listed district West End Historic District (Waxahachie, Texas) but that is different. There could well be a locally designated or even Texas state designated district, but the National Register's NRIS database does not show this item. So, in the absence of source (none present), I remove these claims and remove this article from NRHP categories and from WikiProject NRHP. --doncram (talk) 19:39, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, someone must have restored the claim within the article, and i see mention of "Belo to demolish West End building" in the notes, which does indeed assert that the district was NRHP-listed in November, 1978. With that hint, i manually searched a huge National Park Service document, where, on p.7600(!) indeed that is verified, but it is mentioned as "Westend Historic District", not "West End". And the NRHP's NRIS database has that item. So, i am adding an NRHP infobox and otherwise restoring/expanding coverage here. --do ncr am 06:07, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Map request

A map of the historic district's boundaries is needed. Cacw (talk) 21:07, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:West End Historic District (Dallas)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

This article is well-organized. It could of course use expansion like any other article, but what it lacks very seriously is references. At least.. references according to cite.php. Also conversion from lists to prose where appropriate. drumguy8800 C T 09:22, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Substituted at 22:05, 26 June 2016 (UTC)