Talk:Win–win game/Archives/2012
This is an archive of past discussions about Win–win game. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Merging
I don't think the articles win-win-game and win-win-strategy should be merged. The term win-win-strategy deserves more attention but it shouldn't be reduced to a game strategy. Many real-world strategies and procedures could be modelled with terms from game theory or related theories. In this case I think that would reduce the possible (not necessarily the current) scope of the article. --Fasten 15:58, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
I agree. I don't think they should be merged either. I think someone should expand the current entry of a win-win-strategy. It is critical for successful negotiations and it deserves to be expanded. 30 September 2006
NO merging of these two as per Fasten.
Trade2tradewell 13:51, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Maybe it would be better to create a 'win-win' concept page, leading then to games theories, strategies and so on pages, separatedly. 150.217.27.186 11:07, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, that's a good idea. I was thinking similarly, that win-win game could be a disambiguation page between zero-sum game and win-win strategy. Maybe the latter should rather be merged into principled negotiation, but that should be discussed there. — Sebastian 00:41, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
yeah i think so too . make a 'concept page' it sounds cool .
Merge (yes) with Win-Win being the main heading
Win-win should be the main header with "types" of win-wins as linked or sub definitions. Tekwarrior 20:13, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Game theory
This page says that in game theory a win-win situation is called a zero-sum game. That page states that a zer-sum game means that it is impossible for both participants to win. So I'm going to remove zero-sum from this page, if anyone objects, put it here. Michael Clarke, Esq. (talk) 16:30, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Hmm my mistake. But the non-zero-sum link goes to zero-sum game, which could be confusing (and was). Maybe that should be clarified.--Michael Clarke, Esq. (talk) 16:33, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Ha Ha - no mention of positive sum games
Google brings this page up for positive sum games, but some brilliant wiki editor removed the mention of positive sum games, because who would come looking at win win games for positive sum games!
Wiki is so cool.