Talk:Witness (organization)

Human rights Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Witnessmj (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.

Woah

woah... you just like deleted all the material on the page. what gives? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kristian the Conqueror (talk • contribs) 04:23, 22 April 2006 --Ronz (talk) 17:20, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hardly any material was deleted. Internal links, external links and references were added. While several "to learn more, go 'here'" lines were removed. Natters02 (talk) 18:03, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Although quite a bit needs to be removed or completely re-written. The article is currently worded too much like an advertisement/press release/marketing piece ... and not as a neutral encyclopedic article. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 18:17, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notable?

Anyone claiming that WP:N/WP:CORP have been met? --Ronz (talk) 17:21, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If not, any preferences on deleting or stubbing? --Ronz (talk) 18:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is perhaps marginal notability, given this story, but as most of the page is filled with nonindependant sources I think a one-paragraph stub would be proper coverage. This page shouldn't be an ad for the group, which it currently appears to be. Them From Space 22:36, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think the sections "The Process" , "Campaigns", and "Critical Acclaim" could be purged completely as being pure promotional content (if others agree, then I think that the third party ref in the campaigns section should be salvaged if possible and worked into the history section, as it's one of the few independant refs in the article).

The rest of it appear to be salvageable (lead section and History) but would still need some re-wording. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 23:01, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and removed "The Process" and "Critical Acclaim", leaving "Campaigns" for now until the reference is worked in elsewhere. --Ronz (talk) 17:31, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Witness (human rights group). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120601042435/http://idealab.talkingpointsmemo.com:80/2012/05/google-youtube-human-rights-channel.php to http://idealab.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/05/google-youtube-human-rights-channel.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:53, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]