Talk:Woolmer Hill School

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Woolmer Hill School article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Surrey Low‑importance

	Surrey portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Surrey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Surrey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SurreyWikipedia:WikiProject SurreyTemplate:WikiProject SurreySurrey-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hang-on

I agree that there is promotional drivel in here but this is a valid subject, being a secondary school. Please give me a few minutes to despam it. Thanks. --DanielRigal (talk) 23:33, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done now. Thanks. --DanielRigal (talk) 23:38, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your edit in 2010. Since 2010 a few contraventions of 'peacock' promotional terms were inserted relying on subsequent Ofsted reports, notably the selective excerpts at the headline section of those reports. Those inserting new editors are welcome for their assistance however need to carefully consider what wikipedia is not, WP:EDITORIAL and WP:NPOV. By including the first four or five points of a robust and yet generally positive section of the report, namely 'Teaching', the consulting audience of wikipedia has the professional published data there and the statements will not amount to opinion or original research.- Adam37 Talk 16:19, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]