Talk:X-Flight (Six Flags Great America)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 23:16, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
    Other possible sources should be found (if possible) for the history section.
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    The article will be on hold for 6 days, not 7 as I am leaving for a trip one week today. These issues should be fixable within a few hours so I don't think that it should be a huge problem. If you need really really need more time, I can get another user to close the review after.--Dom497 (talk) 00:06, 1 March 2013 (UTC) Pass!!!--Dom497 (talk) 13:28, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments[edit]

  • Optional, but maybe there could be another picture of the ride outside of the infobox?--Dom497 (talk) 23:19, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Following the roll, the train makes a left turn before going through an Inline twist. During this element, when the train is on a 90-degree angle, riders go through a fake control tower, giving the illusion the train will hit the tower." - Work in something that mention's the word "keyhole".--Dom497 (talk) 00:00, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Surley there's got to be some reviews of the ride. Also, did the coaster win any GTA awards?--Dom497 (talk) 00:00, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • I just did a Google News Search of past and present and couldn't find any reviews of the ride. Also, it did not win any GTA awards.-- Astros4477 (Talk) 19:43, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • You can include more info in the lead such as the soft opening and opening of the coaster and what rides it replaced.--Dom497 (talk) 00:01, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Another thing would to check if there are any other reliable sources that talk about the construction timeline. Just having facebook as a reference in the entire section isn't quite what I would like.--Dom497 (talk) 00:04, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • I haven't been able to find anything else. I think it's ok because it's just offering facts on construction.-- Astros4477 (Talk) 00:58, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      • I agreed from the beginning, I just wanted you to see if there were any other refs then just facebook.--Dom497 (talk) 13:28, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]