Talk:Xenon (program)

This article was nominated for deletion on 15 October 2017. The result of the discussion was keep.

This page was proposed for deletion by DrStrauss (talk · contribs) on 12 October 2017 with the comment:
Potentially fails WP:A7 per the web content clause but clearly fails WP:NSOFT due to lack of significant coverage.
It was contested by Syrenka V (talk · contribs) on 2017-10-13 with the comment:
Used by five nations, significant for privacy concerns, adequate sourcing appears to exist.

Computing: Software

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 0 external links on Xenon (program). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.wired.com/news/technology/security/0,72564-0.html?tw=wn_technology_14

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:36, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Date style in references

In this article, publication dates (and revision dates, if any) are given with the month spelled out, while access (retrieval) and archival dates are given in strictly numerical ISO 8601 format. Please do not change the access and archival dates to any format other than ISO 8601, including the format used for publication dates. Also, please do not change the publication and revision dates to ISO 8601, or to any format that does not fully spell out the month.

The difference in format serves a useful purpose. The ISO 8601 format makes access and archival dates less conspicuous, while drawing more attention to the publication and revision dates, which are likely to be of more interest to readers. Use of the same format for all dates in citations makes the article worse, not better.

—Syrenka V (talk) 23:49, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]