Jump to content

Talk:Yunus Emre/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Comment

Wouldn't it be proper to cite whose translation is given in the text? It is for sure not a "literal" translation...\

Turkish version of the poem

Putting just the English translation of the poem would be better, what do users think?

Rating

I re-rated the article as High instead of Mid. According to Wikipedia if "Subject is notable or significant within the field of Turkey, but not necessarily outside it" then it should be rated high. As it is known, Yunus Emre is one of the most important figures in Turkish literature and philosophy. This new rating appears to be suitable for the article... --Maestro 12:49, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Very poor article

This is a very poor article, please somebody expand it.--85.103.38.136 00:10, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Alevi Yunus :)

This is not fun, i never heard any poem dedicated to him mentioning Ali, and also the dates and birthplace of Yunus is against this, if he lived 3 centuries later he could be alevite due to the tide of alevite terror in anatolia(even as far as in aegea) but it is not wise to call him alevite while he was born just 100 kms away from future ottoman capital who were following Bektasi traditions ( of course not poluted with shiism yet, else even name of Osman I would be smt else). so where are you admin cant you take away the alevi sign there, just because a fanatical alevi wants to have him in his side :) thats turkish hospitality but he was something more than just a muslim... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.103.16.238 (talk) 16:29, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

  • Admins of this vikipedia you must see more carefully articles.This article (like Greek language) so stupidly.Yunus Emre wasn't an Alevi poet he was Hanefi (Sünnî) philophoser-poet !!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.184.236.7 (talk) 22:12, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Alevi?

how come can you put him under a secterian label? he was muslim you just cannot place every historic figure under a sectarian term. a petty act to try looking more scientific i think, jut leave yunus be, he was a muslim, a human, just read his words you will understand how vain it is to try putting him under a sectarian label —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.102.178.244 (talk) 19:27, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Taptuk Emre

Yunus Emre was a pupil of Taptuk Emre. Böri (talk) 06:16, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Yunus Emre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:10, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Linkt to Alevism is missed in this article

Yunus Emre had belonged to the Bektaschi-Tariqa. it is a shame that this isn't mentioned and Wikipedia is supporting turkish-islamic campagnes of the AKP party, whose agenda is to declare all progressiv derwisch as sunnis or orthodox.... I know where this strategy came from - the naqshibandi-apostates! they are so hateful and radical, they can´t find any follower, so they claim even mewlana rumi for they politics...embarrassing — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.247.243.82 (talk) 16:24, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:11, 18 September 2018 (UTC)