Jump to content

Talk:ZenoLive

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contested deletion

[edit]

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --

it is right now sorry!! we just copy and pasted stuff from their website and we're in the process of editing/rewriting to make it appropriate content for an encyclopedia -- it will be done shortly!!

You shouldn't be using Wikipedia as an outlet for communicating about your own enterprise. It isn't permissible to use this site as part of your web presence; this isn't a Facebook or LinkedIn. See WP:COI and WP:Spam. Largoplazo (talk) 18:44, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


i'm sorry if it appeared as though i was trying to make a wikipedia page part of a company's promotional materials or web presence; that was not my intention and would obviously be against the purposes of Wikipedia. i have finished editing the information to maintain Wikipedia's standards of neutral point of view. i believe this article now abides by all of Wikipedia's compliance rules. please let me know if you believe that is not the case, and i will fix the problem right away. @Largoplazo: — Preceding unsigned comment added by Willwelland (talkcontribs) 18:59, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Largoplazo: Why did you write to me if you were going to ignore my answer, as I now see that you've done? There is still a nomination for speedy deletion placed on the ZenoLive page even though the material is no longer promotional, being entirely about ZenoLive and its significance in the world rather than why people would want to use it. If you do not believe that this is the case, please respond and let me know how I can fix it. Otherwise, please remove the nomination for speedy deletion from ZenoLive's page, as there is no longer grounds on which a speedy deletion would be necessary. - willwelland

I "ignored" your answer? My life isn't 100% devoted to watching activity on Wikipedia and responding to it. I just got home from a concert. OK?
I'm still on the fence about the article. I'd just as soon have the administrator who checks on the deletion request form an opinion. Largoplazo (talk) 03:38, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I just took another look. I'm removing the deletion tag, but adding a maintenance tag or two. Largoplazo (talk) 03:42, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]