Talk:Zorg

Zorg (digital photo organizer)

It looks to me as if Zorg (the digital photo organizer) is a minor product which would never get its own article per WP:CORP. If this is true, there is no need to have it on a disambiguation page either, and it gives the impression of being WP:SPAM. Could you point me to some WP:V sources about it, indicating its ilmportance and/or notability, before readding it again please? Fram 12:19, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick search:

—Tokek 13:21, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It appears, though, that "Zorg: Recovered Reality" has only one hit, so I agree that it isn't "real" and should be removed. However I don't think "zorg" is a high traffic article so I really don't see what the fuss is about. Did you research before you made your edits? —Tokek 13:27, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it matters if an article is high traffic or not, the same rules should apply. I had done some research[1], but my Japanese isn't that good ;-), and I couldn't find any good sources I could comprehend (e.g. in English) about it that asserted notability. OF course, it may well be that it is reasonably well-known in Japan and not outside. I'll let it stand for now, as I am unable to judge it. I agree on the other removal you did though. Fram 13:39, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I added it mainly because I thought it was interesting how Zorg[2] was ripping off Picasa's[3] logo and apparently getting away with it. I don't think I was praising anyone by pointing out trademark conflict; I have no affiliation with Zorg, and nobody's getting rewards or payment, but if people don't like it I guess it can go. —Tokek 00:02, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]