Template talk:Did you know/Kelly Key (2001 album)

Kelly Key (2001 album)

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Crisco 1492 (talk)

... that Brazillian recording pop artist Kelly Key's 2001 debut album was at first considered non-profitable pop music in Brazil before being contracted with Warner Music?

Comment: Stephanie J Stone had trouble in July, but it looks like she turned herself around with this article. I am nominating this because not only do I find it interesting, I like that a new editor turned herself around to create a notable article.

Created by Stephanie J Stone (talk). Nominated by Joe Chill (talk) at 23:38, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:

Hook

Length, format, content rules – Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:06, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Source – Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:06, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Interest – Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:06, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image suitability, if applicable – None. Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:06, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
ALT hooks, if proposed –

Article

Length – Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:06, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Vintage – Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:06, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sourcing (V, RS, BLP) – Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:06, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutrality – Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:06, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Plagiarism/close paraphrasing – Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:06, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
copyvio (files) – Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:06, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious faults in prose, structure, formatting –

Comments/discussion:

Good to go. Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:06, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The hook does not make sense and the source that supposedly supports the hook is an article on a different artist which makes no mention of Kelly Key. Yomangani ^talk 10:14, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for catching that. Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:23, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is a no. Hardly any of the claims made in the article are backed up by the cited sources, there are quotes which aren't fully attributed, the sources are of variable quality, it's currently too short (now I've edited out some of the unsupported claims), and the hook is nonsensical. Yomangani ^talk 11:04, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Too much work needs to be done. I will contact the creator about misrepresenting sources. Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:16, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]