Template talk:GA number

Fixing the count[edit]

The numbering is off. I know how to prove this. First look by checking Category:GA-Class Good articles. I will list all the current article here soon.◙◙◙ I M Kmarinas86 U O 2¢ ◙◙◙ 20:30, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The number is based on what's listed on WP:GA, not the category. Gimmetrow 20:34, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That would make the number about 2533 instead of 2464. That's even more what what other editors were able to count! See my talk page for the list (note just a few duplicates on the left, but nowhere near 69.)◙◙◙ I M Kmarinas86 U O 2¢ ◙◙◙ 21:40, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request[edit]

I would like to discuss my request:

It would be handy if the people who incremented the count would also add why the count was changed.

For example I promote article "foobar" to GA-class. Then I would need to add "+1 foobar promotion" To show it was a promotion from a lower class. That way it's easier to keep track of why the count has changed. What are your opinions about this proposition? Regards, Daimanta 16:44, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Protection[edit]

Shouldn't this (along with {{FL number}}...{{FA number}} is semi-protected already) be semi- or full-protected? It looks like there haven't been any issues in a while, but I mean, just in the off-chance that someone decides to come in here and change the number to 2 or something...if that stayed up long enough it could get transcluded all over the place. Politizer ^talk/_contribs 23:16, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not full-protect for sure, otherwise the bot can't update the count. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 15:36, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Interwiki[edit]

uk:Шаблон:GA number--Kusluj (talk) 15:06, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]