Template talk:Navbox visibility
Why its this still a thing?
[edit]Are these issues from 2016 still not resolved? --Donald Trung (talk) 15:47, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
When will this disaster of a decision be fixed?
[edit]Every time I'm on mobile I have to fight so hard to see the navigation boxes (switch to desktop in the browser, mess around with the URL to make the site switch back, zoom in and scroll around in different directions so I can click on stuff, switch back to mobile view to make it so I can actually read the new article, repeat every few minutes for all of the articles I'm flipping between), just because someone decided that if the boxes don't display nicely on mobile they shouldn't be allowed to display at all (@whoever's idea that was, I loathe you with every fiber of my being). I got fed up again today and went through desperately changing all of my mobile settings to try to fix it and it turns out its still impossible because apparently a little sideways scrolling or whatever is somehow worse than this absolute misery. I'm about to cry from frustration, I hate this so much. Why why why why why!? Elliefint (talk) 01:17, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, @Elliefint, and thanks for posting that you're a fan of navboxes. I see you have also posted a similar question at Template talk:Navbox#When will mobile visibility be fixed? WhatamIdoing (talk) 15:24, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you, yes. I wasn't sure where would be the best place to say it. Elliefint (talk) 16:07, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 20 February 2024
[edit] | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change the percentage from 65% to 66%, and the date from last May to January 2024. Thanks. WhatamIdoing (talk) 06:52, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 20 September 2024
[edit] | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change
Briefly, these templates are not included because they are 1) not well designed for mobile, and 2) because they significantly increase page sizes ...
(which has incorrect coordination between clauses, duplicating "because" and pulling "they are" out of the only clause it applies to) to
Briefly, these templates are not included because 1) they are not well designed for mobile, and 2) they significantly increase page sizes ...