Template talk:Single-purpose account

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Single-purpose account template.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1: 90 days

Template:Single-purpose account is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.

Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases.

This template was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Deletion discussions:
keep, 2017 April 8, see discussion. Nomination withdrawn., 12 May 2013, see discussion. Keep., 27 January 2013, see discussion. Keep per WP:SNOW., 15 March 2007, see discussion. Speedy keep, nomination withdrawn., November 14, 2006, see discussion.

Substitution

I don't see any need to substitute this template, and people have been using this template without substitution, so I'm going to remove that instruction for now; please go ahead and revert if there's some reason that I missed. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-13 07:31Z

Special:Contributions link

FYI

– This is a link to the discussion taking place at Template talk:Unsigned#Is Special:Contributions necessary? — CJDOS, Sheridan, OR (talk) 20:54, 3 September 2021‎ (UTC)[reply]

Closed. — CJDOS, Sheridan, OR (talk) 06:12, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What is this for/about?

I read this and found no explanation of why a single-purpose account (SPA) is a bad thing.

The only information I saw on whether a SPA is a bad/good thing is their apparently typical use in sock puppetry.

Is it deemed problematic for a user to have an account they only use for some edits? If so, why?

Could someone provide some additional explanation?

2601:1C1:C180:4F40:5C4A:BE6D:F0D9:20B5 (talk) 04:44, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is typical template documentation and it just describes how to use the template. The background is at WP:SPA which might be included under "see also". Johnuniq (talk) 06:08, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! (I have forgotten how to tag Johnuniq.)

2601:1C1:C180:4F40:0:0:0:452D (talk) 01:06, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request 12 September 2022

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Add "subst:" to the sample template at the top of the page so that it displays a proper example rather than an error message. QuietHere (talk) 16:43, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: or actually "already done" – there is an initial {{safesubst: that is enclosed in <includeonly> tags that, if removed, will show a barebones example template as rendered in [my sandbox]. Editors thought it best to show examples in the template documentation, and to readily show other editors who come to this page the exact error they will see if they forget to substitute this template. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. ^put'r there 18:28, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, that logic makes sense to me. Looks a bit silly but that's no big deal. Thanks for explaining! QuietHere (talk) 18:39, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

my pleasure! Paine 19:19, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]