This template is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Just wondering, since Virgin Group has 20% stakes in AirAsia X, should the link of AirAsia X be included in the template? --Zack2007 06:02, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm pretty sure all the companies on this page have Virgin Group holding the controlling stock, so no, I don't think AirAsia X should be included. NcSchu(Talk) 13:45, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Actually, I was wrong, so I've gone ahead and added it. NcSchu(Talk) 13:47, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
I was about to say that Virgin Group's share in Virgin Blue is only 25%. I am not for or against AirAsia X's presence in the template, just curious on whats the criteria to be put in the box. I guess 20% shares are substantial shares, even though its not called "Virgin", as some of the companies under Virgin Group do not have the word Virgin either. --Zack2007 —Preceding comment was added at 13:52, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, that's why I agreed that it should be added. It's on the Virgin Group page and even though it doesn't have the Virgin name and 20 or 25% isn't a majority holding we've kept companies on the list that have been completely sold off from Virgin so there was really no reason to not include it. NcSchu(Talk) 14:03, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Since mid-last year, two of the Virgin-branded radio stations in Thailand, owned by BEC Tero Radio, Virgin Hitz 95.5 and Virgin Star, now rebranded as Hitz955 and Star FM, removing any Virgin branding from the station. Should this be updated?