Template talk:Visibility

statistically?... not needed

Please remove the term statistically; the remaining unlikely will suffice. I don’t expect we have done some research here on the probability of image talk pages views. --Van helsing (talk) 16:37, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done switched to "very unlikely" MBisanz ^talk 19:47, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Portals?

Do we need this for portals?

Regular portal talk pages are quite active, as are some subpages, such as Portal talk:Poland/Poland-related Wikipedia notice board and it's a bit annoying. I suggest portal talks are excluded from this contraption, however this works. Миша 13 22:39, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with the above. In fact it would be nice if it were possible for editors to remove this from particular pages if they are watching them.--Kotniski (talk) 23:00, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reword

{{editprotected}}
Since for the moment we can't be sure whether any particular page is watched or not (see above thread), please reword the first sentence to something like: "Talk pages in this namespace are typically not watched by many users."--Kotniski (talk) 23:00, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done, with addition of relevant help links as well. {{Nihiltres|talk|log}} 05:39, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{editprotected}} Thanks:) But I think Wikipedia:Namespace would be a better link than Help:Namespace, which is a rather technical page from Meta.--Kotniski (talk) 14:17, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 18:28, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request

Please change the sentence Please consider visiting the Help desk or the village pump for a more prompt response to Please consider visiting the Help desk or the village pump for a quicker response Linking the pages and using 'quicker' instead of 'prompt'. Sungodtemple (talk) 22:38, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]