|Genre||Politics, International Affairs|
|Publisher||Simon & Schuster|
|September 12, 2006|
|Pages||320 p. (hardback edition)|
|LC Class||JC489 .B74 2006|
Bremmer's J Curve describes the relationship between a country's openness and its stability; focusing on the notion that while many countries are stable because they are open (the United States, France, Japan), others are stable because they are closed (North Korea, Cuba, Iraq under Saddam Hussein). According to Bremmer, a government's motivations differ dramatically depending on where they fall on the J curve.
J Curve model
The x-axis of the political J-Curve graph measures the "openness" (of freedom) of the State in question, and the y-axis measures the stability of that same state. It suggests that those states that are 'closed'/undemocratic/unfree (such as the Communist dictatorships of China and Cuba) are very stable; however, as one progresses right, along the x-axis, it is evident that stability (for relatively short period of time in the lengthy life of nations) decreases, creating a dip in the graph, until beginning to pick up again as the 'openness' of a state increases; at the other end of the graph to closed states are the open states of the West, such as the United States or the United Kingdom. Thus, a J-shaped curve is formed.
States can travel both forward (right) and backwards (left) along this J-curve, and so stability and openness are never secure. The J is steeper on the left hand side, as it is easier for a leader in an authoritarian state to create stability by closing the country than to build a civil society and establish accountable institutions; the curve is higher on the far right than left because states that prevail in opening their societies (Eastern Europe, for example) ultimately become more stable than authoritarian regimes.
Bremmer's entire curve can shift up or down depending on economic resources available to the government in question. Therefore, Saudi Arabia's relative stability at every point along the curve rises or falls depending on the price of oil; China's curve, meanwhile, analogously depends on the country's economic growth.
The developed world should neither shelter nor militarily destabilize authoritarian regimes—unless those regimes represent an imminent threat to the national security of other states. Developed states should instead work to create the conditions most favorable for a closed regime’s safe passage through the least stable segment of the J curve — however and whenever the slide toward instability comes. And developed states should minimize the risk these states pose the rest of the world as their transition toward modernity begins.
- David Agpar proposes The J Curve for an Iraq solution
- Richard Beck on The J Curve and the Missional Church
- The J Curve and Malaysia
- The J Curve and Zimbabwe
- "Books of the year 2006". The Economist. 2006-12-06. Retrieved 2018-07-19.
- J Curve on The Daily Show
- The J Curve on BBC Newsnight Bookclub
- The J Curve: Bremmer at the Council on Foreign Relations
- Bill Emmott and Fareed Zakaria on The J Curve in Slate (magazine)
- J Curve in the Washington Post
- Curve an Effective Tool in US Foreign Policy, by Cecil Johnson. Review in The Boston Globe. October 1, 2006.