Jump to content

User:DVdm: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by Treeweetreewee (talk) to last revision by Ishdarian (HG)
m Replaced content with ' stop annoying my friend treeweetreewee'
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Userboxtop|This...}}
{{User:UBX/vandalized|40.75}}
{{userboxbottom}}


stop annoying my friend treeweetreewee
== A trivial refutation of one of Dingle's Fumbles (Ref: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Herbert_Dingle/Archive_5#A_trivial_refutation Talk:Herbert Dingle Archive]) ==

On page 230 in [http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Dingle/Dingle_Appendices.pdf this appendix] to [http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Dingle/Dingle_SCIENCE_At_the_Crossroads.pdf "Science At the Crossroads"], Dingle writes:
: (start quote)
: ''Thus, between events E0 and E1, A advances by t1 and B by t'1 = a t1 by (1). Therefore''
::: <math>\frac{\color{OliveGreen}rate\ of\ A}{\color{Blue}rate\ of\ B} = \frac{\color{OliveGreen}t_1}{\color{Blue}a t_1} = \frac{1}{a} > 1 \qquad (3)</math>
: ...
: ''Thus, between events E0 and E2, B advances by t'2 and A by t2 = a t'2 by (2). Therefore''
::: <math>\frac{\color{Red}rate\ of\ A}{\color{Brown}rate\ of\ B} = \frac{\color{Red}a t'_2}{\color{Brown}t'_2} = a < 1 \qquad (4)</math>
: '' '''Equations (3) and (4) are contradictory: hence the theory requiring them must be false.''' ''
: (end quote)
Dingle should have written as follows:
: (start correction)
: ''Thus, between events E0 and E1, A, which is '''not present''' at both events, advances by t1 and B, which is '''present''' at both events, by t'1 = a t1 by (1). Therefore''
::: <math>\frac{ \color{OliveGreen} rate\ of\ clock\ not\ present\ at\ both\ events}{ \color{Blue}rate\ of\ clock\ present\ at\ both\ events} = \frac{\color{OliveGreen}coordinate\ time}{\color{Blue}proper\ time} = \frac{\color{OliveGreen}rate\ of\ A}{\color{Blue}rate\ of\ B} = \frac{\color{OliveGreen}t_1}{\color{Blue}a t_1} = \frac{1}{a} > 1 \qquad (3)</math>
: ...
: ''Thus, between events E0 and E2, B, which is '''not present''' at both events, advances by t'2 and A, which is '''present''' at both events, by t2 = a t'2 by (2). Therefore''
::: <math>\frac{\color{Brown}rate\ of\ clock\ not\ present\ at\ both\ events}{\color{Red}rate\ of\ clock\ present\ at\ both\ events} = \frac{\color{Brown}coordinate\ time}{\color{Red}proper\ time} = \frac{\color{Brown}rate\ of\ B}{\color{Red}rate\ of\ A} = \frac{\color{Brown}t'_2}{\color{Red}a t'_2} = \frac{1}{a} > 1 \qquad (4)</math>
: '' '''Equations (3) and (4) are consistent: hence there is no reason to say that the theory requiring them must be false.''' ''
: (end correction)

[[Image:DingleRefutation.png|center]]

[[User:DVdm|DVdm]] 12:18, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:28, 8 November 2011

stop annoying my friend treeweetreewee