I hate people who do not only follow science, but in addition to that make a dogma of the state of the art - it could change. You can agree with current science but be a fanatic at the same time - terrible!
I like to give a voice to minorities and dissidents of the scientific state of the art, as long as it is rational or even scientific critics, and not pseudo-science. It is clear, that an article can present them only in the second place, but second place is better than no place. And more scientific in my opinion.
