Recently, Tking 1974 added an "other uses" page to the "expense ratio" page that is very clearly for a term with an entirely different meaning, "operating expense ratio". Rather than just delete that particular edit, I added information that provided a very clear distinction between the terms "expense ratio" and "operating expense ratio". Mean as custard, in my opinion, improperly removed my contributions. Since operating expense ratio has a distinctly different definition, I believe either my edit shout be reinstated, or the "other uses" section deleted entirely from that article.
Very clearly, at the very least, the additions I had provided should be included with the other uses section that was added....and possibly a new page with "operating expense ratio" as a title should be added.
|Search user languages|
|“||To me he is noteworthy, but I decidedly doubt that I shall succeed in proving it to the reader.||”|
|“||I quite agree that it is superfluous, but since it is already written, let it stand.||”|
(From The Brothers Karamazov, trans. Richard Pevear and Larissa Volokhonsky, North Point Press, 1990, pps. 3-4.)
|“||There are some 'scientific systems' of transliteration, helpful to people who know enough Arabic not to need helping, but a washout for the world. I spell my names anyhow, to show what rot the systems are.||”|