User:Daniel Mietchen/Talks/Academic Publishing in Europe 2012/Abstract
| Abstract | Start | Q & A | Research cycle | Journal of the future | Reuse | Summary | Q & A | Notes |
 Fig. 1 A page from the lab notebook underlying the experiments described in Lang, G. I.; Botstein, D. (2011). Rusche, Laura N (ed.). "A Test of the Coordinated Expression Hypothesis for the Origin and Maintenance of the GAL Cluster in Yeast". PLoS ONE. 6 (9): e25290. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025290. PMC 3178652. PMID 21966486. {{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link) CC BY.  Fig. 2 Papers: Charles Thomas Brues (1924). "Notes on Some New England Phoridæ (Diptera)". Psyche: A Journal of Entomology. 31: 41–44. doi:10.1155/1924/42175. {{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link) Public Domain. Researchers spend much of their time writing - e.g. grant applications, lab notebook entries, code, conference abstracts, progress reports and papers. Traditionally, only very few of these works have been published, such that the research process was - and in many cases still is - largely hidden from the public. This talk will provide a different perspective on the matter: what if research publishing were to focus on the process rather than coarse snapshots thereof? Given that most research steps nowadays already take place digitally or at least leave digital traces, an integration of research and publishing workflows is becoming technically feasible, and it can be widened to include impact assessment and outreach as well as provisions for reuse, especially in educational contexts. Existing examples will be highlighted and challenges for researchers, publishers and research administrators identified. |