User:Doug Coldwell/Sandboxes/Sandbox 78

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

All of the who's who is in an ascending chronological timeline starting in the 4th century BC (chapter 1) and going to the 2nd century AD (chapter 134). All the short "bios" follow the same set of rules for deciphering all the way through. The basic rules are that the decoded English word equals exactly the same amount of letters as in the coded word. The decoded word is usually a biblical name or word, however not always. When On is capalized the word it modifies is the coded word. When Against is capalized it means "for." The decoded parts fit the story of the bio correctly - which is a most important factor! All the "characters" are ancient Romans and can be found in Wikipedia. Usually the next sequencing person is somehow connected to the previous person. They all swirl around the Roman "characters" of Petrarch's work Africa and many can be found in his epic poem. Another rule is that only if the word "and" or "but" follow a comma (in the coded part) then that segment is true, otherwise the decoded part is the opposite.

Interesting is that Boccaccio's Famous Women plus 28 (Chronicle of Universal History) equal the 134 bio's here, not counting the last one as that is a description of the original author and not the ancient Romans.
Another interesting fact is that "supposedly" this got translated in 1893, which just happens to be exactly 1500 years from when it "supposedly" was written in the year 393 AD in ancient Latin. Coincidence? Then I won't mention that the 14th ruling year of Emperor Theodosius was 393 AD! AND did you know Petrarch was born in the city of Arezzo (6 letters), which province borders the Florence Province (BOTH 8 letters).

Look at these that I have decoded and pick one or more to analyze. Compare to the coded part. Ask me detailed specific questions on how it was decoded and I will give you the details on exactly how it was decoded - as I am the only one that so far has figured out the code. I'll share it with you as you have helped me much on Wikipedia articles. I believe you can easily understand it, especially after some more details.

Think about what this implies. Perhaps you have some comments on that. I realize Petrarch did not know English, however this material of his was available after 1341 when he was crowned poet laureate. I say this was done by an English professor in England sometime between 1341 and 1384, especially since many of the English words are pretty interesting that only someone with a very good handle on English would know.

The last chapter sums up what the original author (Petrarch) did and gives details on him. Perhaps you would like to take this chapter to get some details on, as it is fairly complicated. Ask very detailed questions, as this then will reveal the code. If you read over this last chapter it reveals some very interesting items - things I have been saying all along. Hopefully you think that somehow I made all this come out this way. I would thank you much for that compliment, however it wouldn't be the truth as I don't have that kind of knowledge. Please ask me some detailed questions and I would appreciate your opinion as to what you think the decoded material implies. Me, I'm thinking something is amiss. Perhaps I am just biased. You? Please give me any comments, remarks, and questions ONLY here in my sandbox. Thanks.--Doug Coldwell talk 13:53, 22 December 2009 (UTC)