Jump to content

User:Georgiapeach5/Cerium anomaly

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The cerium anomaly, in geochemistry, is the phenomenon whereby cerium (Ce) concentration is either depleted or enriched in a rock relative to the other rare-earth elements (REEs)[1]. A Ce anomaly is said to be "negative" if Ce is depleted relative to the other REEs and is said to be "positive" if Ce is enriched relative to the other REEs[1].

Cerium Oxidation States[edit]

Cerium is a rare-earth element (lanthanide) characterized by two different redox states: III and IV. Unlike other lanthanide elements, which are only trivalent (with the notable exception of Eu2+), Ce3+ can be oxidized by atmospheric oxygen (O2) to Ce4+ under alkaline conditions[2].

The cerium anomaly relates to the decrease in solubility, which accompanies the oxidation of Ce(III) to Ce(IV). Under reducing conditions, Ce3+ is relatively soluble, while under oxidizing conditions CeO2 precipitates[1]. Sediments deposited under oxic or anoxic conditions can preserve the geochemical signature of Ce3+ or Ce4+ as long as no early diagenesis occurs[1].

Crystal structure of Ceria-zirconia. Ce4+ has the same charge and similar ionic radius as Zr4+ resulting in elemental substitution and therefore a positive cerium anomaly.[1]

Cerium Anomalies in Zircon[edit]

Zircon (ZrSiO4) is commonly found in felsic igneous rock[3]. Because both Ce3+ and Ce4+ can substitute for Zirconium, Zircon often has a positive Ce anomaly. Ce4+ substitutes with Zr much more easily than Ce3+ because Ce4+ (ionic radius 0.97Å) has the same charge and a similar ionic radius as Zr4+ (ionic radius 0.84Å)[1]. Therefore, the oxidation state of the magma is what determines the Ce anomaly in Zircon[3]. If the oxygen fugacity is high, more Ce3+ will oxidize to Ce4+ and create a larger positive Ce anomaly in the zircon structure. At lower levels of oxygen fugacity, the level of Ce anomaly will also be lower[3].

Cerium Anomalies in Coal[edit]

Negative Cerium Anomalies[edit]

Cerium in coal is typically weakly negative, meaning that it is present at slightly lower concentrations than the other rare-earth elements[2]. Cerium anomalies in coal are influenced by the sediment source region[2]. Coal mined from mafic regions dominated by basalts, such as the location of the Xinde Mine in China, does not have a Ce-anomaly[2]. In contrast, coal mined in felsic rock regions, such as Guxu Coalfield in in China, does have weakly negative Ce-anomalies[2]. Negative Ce-anomalies can also be attributed to the weathering and oxidation of the coal-mining region[1]. During oxidation, Ce3+ precipitates out as CeO2, leaving less Ce in the coal[2].

Positive Cerium Anomalies[edit]

While cerium anomalies in coal are usually negative, they can rarely be positive as well[4]. This can occur during volcanic eruptions when volcanic ash is weathered into mafic tuffs with positive Ce-anomalies[1]. The Pavlovka deposit in Far East Russia has large positive Ce-anomalies in its Fe-Mn oxyhydroxide ores[4]. Because cerium is one of only two REEs that can obtain an oxidation number of +4, Ce4+ is absorbed into Mn(IV) oxides instead of other REEs and this results in a positive Ce-anomaly[4].

See also[edit]

References[edit]

Category:Geochemistry Category:Lanthanides

  1. ^ a b c d e f g h Thomas, J. B., Bodnar, R. J., Shimizu, N., Chesner, C. A. (2003) Melt inclusions in zircon. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 53 (1), 63–87.
  2. ^ a b c d e f Dai, Shifeng; Graham, Ian; Ward, Colin (2016). "A review of anomalous rare earth elements and yttrium in coal". International Journal of Coal Ecology. 159: 82–95.
  3. ^ a b c Zhong, Shihua; Seltmann, Reimar; Qu, Hongying; Song, Yingxin (2019-12-01). "Characterization of the zircon Ce anomaly for estimation of oxidation state of magmas: a revised Ce/Ce* method". Mineralogy and Petrology. 113 (6): 755–763. doi:10.1007/s00710-019-00682-y. ISSN 1438-1168.
  4. ^ a b c Laveuf, C.; Cornu, S. (2009). "A review on the potentiality of Rare Earth Elements to trace pedogenetic processes". Geoderma. 154 (1–2): 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.10.002. ISSN 0016-7061.