This is the user sandbox of Hhnhii. A user sandbox is a subpage of the user's user page. It serves as a testing spot and page development space for the user and is not an encyclopedia article. Create or edit your own sandbox here.

Other sandboxes: Main sandbox | Template sandbox

Finished writing a draft article? Are you ready to request review of it by an experienced editor for possible inclusion in Wikipedia? Submit your draft for review!

Social Group Dynamics on Gender Equality

Conceptualisation.

Social Group Dynamics

Lewin (1943, 1948, 1951) used the terminology "dynamic" to convey the tremendous effects that groups generally have on individuals as a result of sharing their perspectives, sentiments, and attitudes. Whether they are minuscule duties-driven units or immense statistical classifications, social groups give their members a common identity that guides and assesses their beliefs, practices, and selves (Hogg, 2016). That process of a societal group and its members behaving and responding to changing situations is called Social Group Dynamics (Lewin, 1951).

Gender Identity

The degree to which an individual feels that they are similar to others of a particular gender during the process of creating their own identity and committing to its gendered defining principles, according to Steensma et al. (2013), is known as gender identity; alternatively said, it refers to a person's identification as either male, female, or another gender (De Vries et al., 2013).

In the preliminary studies on gender identity, Kohlberg (1966) defined gender identity as the "cognitive self-categorisation as boy or girl"; Fagot & Leinbach (1985) defined it as "the concept of the self as male or female"... In its entirety, it seems apparent that this is a person's perception of themselves: they desire to be classified as a certain gender so that society will see them as such.

The Impact of Social Group Dynamics on Gender Identity.

Overall

Given that humans are born, grown, and live in societies made up of many groups, it is natural that we all have identities that are greatly shaped by various cultural settings and the different familial dynamics within which we are involved.

In general, identity formation—and gender identity development in particular—is portrayed as a social and individual process in which the environment creates and is affected by identity (Adams & Marshall, 1996). The process of this development begins at the very initial stage of humans' lifetimes; often, between 18 and 24 months old, the children have already been able to recognise their own gender and others' as well. (Steensma et al., 2013).

In compliance with the initial notions of social learning and identity, conventional gender behaviors were believed to be reinforced in sex-segregated social circles, and gendered role behaviors were considered to be formed by incentives, indicating that acceptable play would be rewarded (De Vires, 2013). However, as the body of literature has grown, more profound understandings have emerged: Numerous social group dynamics, including family and parental supervision, the physical environment's structure, varied interactional patterns, fellow students and schooling, societal norms, and media consumption, profoundly influence the establishment of gender identities (Katz, 1986; Bussey, 2011; Liao et al., 2012).

Cultural Influence

Far long before the neonates' actual access to the physical societal world, social milieu has been prepared for the gender polarity (Katz, 1986). From a small toy for children to a person's thinking, stereotypes are applied to every insignificant part of life; these stereotypes were developed earlier than any children were born.

The development of more gender-stereotyped attributes is speculated to be usually determined by the amount of time spent in gendered social environments (Steensma, 2013). Individuals' preferences, particularly those of newborns, are not genuinely their own; rather, they are stereotypical gendered inclinations that were instilled in them at such an early age that it became accepted practice to better comply. In particular, males' play behaviors are perceived as rougher and more erratic, while girls' are perceived as more modest, kind, and cooperative; guys excel in athletics and arithmetic, while girls excel in literature and reading... though in the modern period, women are encouraged to be more autonomous and men are open to express themselves more.

From a cultural perspective, gender roles are also dictated as an essential component of the broad societal standards that are registered in the majority of humanity's bones and that parents naturally instill in their offspring upon internalisation (Macobby, 1998). Children's gender identity development is impacted by this cultural prejudice, which also affects their self-efficacy beliefs and eventual objectives alongside parental expectations.

Family and Parental Influence

In the utmost beginning stage of life, children are already affected by the gender-related expectations of their families.

The extremely common usage of gender designations by others is one example of an environmental antecedent; according to Katz's (1986) explanation of this occurrence, the majority of parents and family members would have a strong desire to shape the kid into a suitable category based on their own long-held ideas of maleness and femaleness since they had previously undergone sex socialisation for an extensive length of time; this is probably demonstrated by the tendency for adult behaviors to differ according to gender designations; these behaviors frequently involve differences in voice pitch, smell and visual signals, and caregiver availability.

Precisely, the approximate age of a child at which gender-related expectations are said to manifest is around six months, whereupon moms engage differently with their body language and dads exhibit more raucous behavior toward infant boys, and gender-appropriate toys will be exposed to children at approximately 12 months old (Smith & Lloyd, 1978; Snow et al., 1983; Liao et al., 2012). Subsequently, a more strongly gendered approach would be displayed, where parents present an instance of separate practices for boys and girls, accelerating gender differences in children's development and discouraging behavioral differences across genders throughout their attention and conduction of evaluation (Bussey, 2011). As a result, gender-based early experiences and relationships have been profoundly impacted since infancy.

Educational Environment Influence

A child's gender definitions would be much expanded during the preschool and elementary school years while they were exposed to a wider setting. Culturally labeled categories are quickly learned through observations of sex-different behaviors and the accompanying disparity by adults, as well as cognitive development of concepts (Katz, 1986); for instance, one of the most popular categorical stereotypes revolves around toys (dolls for girls, trucks for boys), future occupation (nurse for females, engineer for males), domestic roles (cooking for moms, electric repairing for dads), etc.

Youngsters acquire expertise by monitoring and replicating others, particularly those of their own gender. Liao et al. (2012) proposed that individuals form their gender-related conceptions of self and others, or "gender schemas", throughout interpersonal relationships, and these schemas persist to be altered in response to the results generated by behavioral decisions that are made dependently.

Additionally, it has been suggested that several elements, including manuals, instructional materials, counseling, educators, and, most importantly, peers, all contribute to the maintenance of gender-role stereotypes and disparities in the educational setting (Levitin & Chananie, 1972; Minuchin & Shapiro, 1983).

Peer Group Influence

More sex-related variations will become apparent as kids progress through grade school and beyond, including more substantial responsibilities, activities and operations, and companion selections preferences (Katz, 1986).

At this age, youngsters prefer spending time in groups with friends of the same gender, hence increasing sociability is one of the discernible elements. Gender segregation holds not only immediate social interactions but also long-term impacts on multifaceted aspects regarding identity formation, as it influences individuals' self-concept perceptions and aspirations. This tendency helps to promote the reinforcement of gender-typed behaviours and societal expectations, as youngsters will need to modify their choice of outcome interactions to conform themselves with a view to fitting in with the gender-specific group norms (Kohlberg, 1966; Thompson, 1975; Gelman et al., 1986; Bauer & Coyne, 1997; Maccoby, 1998; Ruble et al., 2006; Zosuls et al., 2009). The quest for acceptance and approval from peers fosters this social conformity, which establishes traditional gender conventions and standards at a young age. These gender identities are thus perpetuated by peer acceptance or rejection, making gender a crucial component of social interactions (Bussey & Bandura, 1992).

In addition, children's development of a gender identity and social development broadly are both profoundly affected by social modeling resulting from gender segregation. Children who spend more time with their peers of the same gender develop attitudes and interests aligning with their stereotyped gender identity, which are likewise encouraged by their peers. (Martin & Fabes, 2001; Bussey & Perry, 1982; Leaper & Friedman, 2007). Furthermore, children develop and strengthen their sex identification by seeing and copying the activities of their fellow pupils who reflect the same gender (Bandura, 1986; Bussey & Bandura, 1984).

All of this ultimately relates to how growing kids develop in different societal circumstances, such as how they learn socially stereotyped gendered beliefs and attitudes and how they shape their gender identification thinking in the future.

Limitations

While exploring how social group dynamics affect gender identity development, several limitations must be acknowledged. Firstly, the scope of this essay is still remaining limited, and many aspects of gender identity development maintain unexplored. Factors such as socioeconomic, mass media and popular cultures, along with individual psychological differences also play crucial roles and warrant further investigations. Secondly, the validity of the findings may be questioned due to the reliance on existing literature and theoretical frameworks, which may not fully capture the complexity of gender identity development. The interpretations drawn from these sources may not be broadly yet only generally applicable to the bare surface, highlighting the need for deeper and diverse research methodologies.

Moreover, there is a significant need for more empirical and longitudinal studies to better understand more thorough insights and long-term effects of the correlation between social group dynamics and gender identity. Current research often relies on cross-sectional studies, which provide a snapshot in time but fail to capture the evolving nature of gender identity over the lifespan.

Lastly, the practical application of these findings to real-world settings may be limited. The controlled environments of many studies do not always reflect the complexities and variances of everyday social interactions. Therefore, caution must be exercised when generalising these findings to broader populations, and further research is needed to enhance their real-world relevance.

References

Adams, G. R., & Marshall, S. K. (1996). A developmental social psychology of identity: Understanding the person‐in‐context. Journal of adolescence, 19(5), 429-442.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986(23-28), 2.

Bauer, P. J., & Coyne, M. J. (1997). When the Name Says it All: Preschoolers’ Recognition and Use of the Gendered Nature of Common Proper Names. Social Development, 6(3), 271–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.1997.tb00106.x

Bussey, K. (2011). Gender identity development. Handbook of identity theory and research, 603-628.

Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1984). Influence of gender constancy and social power on sex-linked modeling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(6), 1292–1302. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.6.1292

Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1992). Self-Regulatory mechanisms governing gender Development. Child Development, 63(5), 1236–1250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1992.tb01692.x

Bussey, K., & Perry, D. (1982). Same-sex imitation: The avoidance of cross-sex models or the acceptance of same-sex models? Sex Roles, 8(7). https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00287572

De Vries, A. L. C., Kreukels, B. P. C., Steensma, T. D., & McGuire, J. K. (2013). Gender Identity Development: A Biopsychosocial perspective. In Focus on sexuality research. 53–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7441-8_3

Fagot, B. L., & Leinbach, M. D. (1985). Gender Identity: Some thoughts on an old concept. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 24(6), 684–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-7138(10)60110-0

Gelman, S. A., Collman, P., & Maccoby, E. E. (1986). Inferring Properties from Categories versus Inferring Categories from Properties: The Case of Gender. Child Development, 57(2), 396. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130595

Hogg, M. A. (2016). Social Identity Theory. In Peace psychology book series. 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29869-6_1

Katz, P. A. (1986). Gender identity: Development and consequences. The social psychology of female-male relations: A critical analysis of central concepts, 21-67.

Kohlberg, L. (1966). A cognitive-development analysis of children's sex-role concepts and attitudes. The development of sex defference.

Kohlberg, L. (1968). Early education: A cognitive-developmental view. Child development, 1013-1062.

Leaper, C., & Friedman, C. K. (2007). The socialization of gender. Handbook of socialization: Theory and research, 561-587.

Levitin, T. E., & Chananie, J. D. (1972). Responses of Female Primary School Teachers to Sex-Typed Behaviors in Male and Female Children. Child Development, 43(4), 1309. https://doi.org/10.2307/1127517

Lewin, K. (1943). Psychology and the process of group living. The Journal of Social Psychology, 17(1), 113-131.

Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving social conflicts: Selected papers on group dynamics

Lewin, K. (1951). Intention, will and need. In D. Rapaport, Organization and pathology of thought: Selected sources (pp. 95–153). Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/10584-005

Liao, L., Audi, L., Magritte, E., Meyer-Bahlburg, H. F., & Quigley, C. A. (2012). Determinant factors of gender identity: A commentary. Journal of Pediatric Urology, 8(6), 597–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2012.09.009

Maccoby, E. E. (1998). The two sexes: Growing up apart, coming together. Harvard University Press.

Martin, C. L., & Fabes, R. A. (2001). The stability and consequences of young children's same-sex peer interactions. Developmental Psychology, 37(3), 431–446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.37.3.431

Minuchin, P. P., & Shapiro, E. K. (1983). School as a context for social development. Handbook of child psychology: formerly Carmichael's Manual of child psychology/Paul H. Mussen, editor.

Ruble, D. N., Martin, C. L., & Berenbaum, S. A. (2007). Gender development. Handbook of child psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0314

Smith, C., & Lloyd, B. (1978). Maternal Behavior and Perceived Sex of Infant: revisited. Child Development, 49(4), 1263. https://doi.org/10.2307/1128775

Snow, M. E., Jacklin, C. N., & Maccoby, E. E. (1983). Sex-of-Child differences in Father-Child interaction at one year of age. Child Development, 54(1), 227. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129880

Steensma, T. D., Kreukels, B. P., De Vries, A. L., & Cohen-Kettenis, P. T. (2013). Gender identity development in adolescence. Hormones and Behavior, 64(2), 288–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2013.02.020

Thompson, S. K. (1975). Gender Labels and early Sex Role development. Child Development, 46(2), 339. https://doi.org/10.2307/1128126

Zosuls, K. M., Ruble, D. N., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Shrout, P. E., Bornstein, M. H., & Greulich, F. K. (2009). The acquisition of gender labels in infancy: Implications for gender-typed play. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 688–701. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014053