Jump to content

User:Ioe bidome/Development of Proto-Germanic

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Phonological stages from Proto-Indo-European to end of Proto-Germanic

[edit]

The following changes are known or presumed to have occurred in the history of Proto-Germanic in the wider sense from the end of Proto-Indo-European up to the point that Proto-Germanic began to break into mutually unintelligible dialects.

Pre-Proto-Germanic (Pre-PGmc)

[edit]

This stage began with the separation of a distinct speech, perhaps while it was still forming part of the Proto-Indo-European dialect continuum. It contained many innovations that were shared with other Indo-European branches to various degrees, probably through areal contacts, and mutual intelligibility with other dialects would have remained for some time. It was nevertheless on its own path, whether dialect or language.

Allophonic colouring of /e/ adjacent to laryngeal consonants:[1][2]
  • [h₂e] > [h₂a]*h₂énti 'in front' > *h₂ánti > *andi 'in addition'
  • [eh₂] > [ah₂]*meh₂tḗr 'mother' > *mah₂tḗr > *mōdēr
  • [h₃e] > [h₃o]*h₃érō 'eagle' > *h₃órō > *arô
  • [eh₃] > [oh₃]*bʰléh₃mō 'flower' > *bʰlóh₃mō > *blōmô
Merging of PIE "palatovelar" and "velar" plosives ("centumization"):[3]
  • /ḱ/ > /k/*ḱm̥tóm 'hundred' > *km̥tóm > *hundą
  • /ǵ/ > /g/*wérǵom 'work' > *wérgom > *werką
  • /ǵʰ/ > /gʰ/*ǵʰh₁yéti 'to go, walk' > *gʰh₁yéti > *gaiþi
  • The actual pronunciation of the "palatovelar" and "velar" series is not reconstructible; it may be that the "palatovelars" were actually plain velars, and the "velars" were pronounced even farther back (post-velar or uvular) so it may be more accurate to say that, for example, /k/ > /ḱ/. Some also claim that the two series may not even have been distinct in PIE. See centum and satem languages.
Epenthesis of /u/ before the syllabic sonorants:[4][5][6][a]
  • /m̥/ > /um/*ḱm̥tóm 'hundred' > *kumtóm > *hundą
  • /n̥/ > /un/*n̥tér 'inside' > *untér > *under 'among'
  • /l̥/ > /ul/*wĺ̥kʷos 'wolf' > *wúlkʷos > *wulfaz
  • /r̥/ > /ur/*wŕ̥mis 'worm' > *wúrmis > *wurmiz
An epenthetic /s/ was inserted already in PIE after dental consonants when they were followed by a suffix beginning with a dental.[8][9]
  • This sequence now becomes /TsT/ > /ts/ > /ss/*wid-tós 'known' (pronounced *widstos) > *witstós > *wissós > *wissaz 'certain'[10][9]
Geminate consonants are shortened after a consonant or a long vowel — *káyd-tis 'act of calling' (pronounced *káydstis) > *káyssis > *káysis > *haisiz 'command'.[10] This change may have occurred after Grimm's or Verner's laws.[11]
Word-final long vowels are lengthened to "overlong" vowels — *séh₁mō 'seeds' > *séh₁mô > *sēmô[12]
Loss of laryngeals, phonemicising the allophones of /e/:
  • Word-initial laryngeals are lost before a consonant — *h₁dóntm̥ 'tooth, acc.' > *dóntum > *tanþų[13][14]
  • Laryngeals are lost before vowels — *h₁ésti 'is' > *ésti > *isti[15]
  • If a high vowel was succeeded by a laryngeal, a semivowel developed between the hiatus *priHós "beloved" > *priyos > *frijaz "free" [16]
  • Laryngeals are lost after vowels but lengthen the preceding vowel: /VH/ > /Vː/*séh₁mō 'seeds' > *sēmô[17]
    • Two nonhigh vowels that come to stand in hiatus because of that change contract into an overlong vowel — *-oHom 'genitive plural' > *-ôm > *-ǫ̂; *-eh₂es 'eh₂-stem nom. pl.' > *-âs > *-ôz[18]
    • In word-final position, the resulting long vowels remain distinct from (shorter than) the overlong vowels that were formed from PIE word-final long vowels — *-oh₂ 'thematic 1st sg.' > *[12]
  • Laryngeals remain between consonants.
Cowgill's law: /h₃/ (and possibly /h₂/) is strengthened to /g/ between a sonorant and /w/*n̥h₃mé 'us two' > *n̥h₃wé > *ungwé > *unk[19]
Vocalisation of remaining laryngeals: /H/ > /ə/*ph₂tḗr 'father' > *pətḗr > *fadēr; *sámh₂dʰos 'sand' > *sámədʰos > *samdaz[20][21][a]
Velars are labialised by following /w/: *éḱwos 'horse' > *ékwos > *ékʷos > *ehwaz[22]
Labiovelars are delabialised next to /u/ or before /t/:[23][24]
  • /kʷ/ > /k/*nókʷts 'night' > *nókts > *nahts
  • /gʷ/ > /g/*gʷémtis ~ *gʷm̥téys 'step, act of walking' > *gʷumtís > *gumtís > *kumþiz 'coming, arrival'
  • /gʷʰ/ > /gʰ/*gʷʰéntis ~ *gʷʰn̥tís 'killing' > *gʷʰuntís > *gʰuntís > *gunþiz 'battle'
  • This rule continued to operate into the Proto-Germanic period.[citation needed]
Osthoff's law may have applied to Germanic:[25][26]
  • *h₂wéh₁n̥tos > *wēntós > *wentós > *windaz "wind"
  • *h₂yuHn̥ḱós 'young' > yūnkos*yunkós > *yunhós > *yungós > *jungaz

Early Proto-Germanic

[edit]

This stage began its evolution as a dialect of Proto-Indo-European that had lost its laryngeals and had five long and six short vowels as well as one or two overlong vowels. The consonant system was still that of PIE minus palatovelars and laryngeals, but the loss of syllabic resonants already made the language markedly different from PIE proper. Mutual intelligibility might have still existed with other descendants of PIE, but it would have been strained, and the period marked the definitive break of Germanic from the other Indo-European languages and the beginning of Germanic proper, containing most of the sound changes that are now held to define this branch distinctively. This stage contained various consonant and vowel shifts, the loss of the contrastive accent inherited from PIE for a uniform accent on the first syllable of the word root, and the beginnings of the reduction of the resulting unstressed syllables.

Dybo's law :Long vowels before resonants were shortened before a stressed syllable.[6][b]
  • gʰloh₃-nó-m "Shine" >gʰlōnóm > gʰlonóm>*glaną
  • ḱuHlós "Hollow" > kūlós >kulós > *hulaz
Loss of word-final non-high short vowels: /e/, /a/, /o/*wóyde '(s)he knows' > *wóyd > *wait[28]
  • A /j/ or /w/ preceding the vowel is also lost — *tósyo 'of that' > *tós > *þas[29]
  • Single-syllable words were not affected, but clitics were — *-kʷe 'and' > *-kʷ > *-hw[30]
  • When the lost vowel was accented, the accent shifted to the preceding syllable — *n̥smé 'us' > *n̥swé > *unswé > *úns > *uns (not **unz, showing that loss occurred before Verner's law)[30]
Grimm's law: Chain shift of the three series of plosives. Voiced plosives had already been devoiced before a voiceless obstruent prior to this stage.
  • Voiceless plosives become fricatives, unless preceded by another obstruent. In a sequence of two voiceless obstruents, the second obstruent remains a plosive.[31][11][32]
    • /p/ > */ɸ/ (*f) — *ph₂tḗr 'father' > *fəþḗr > *fadēr
    • /t/ >*/θ/ (*þ) — *tód 'that' > *þód > *þat
    • /k/ > */x/ (*h) — *kátus 'fight' > *háþus > *haþuz; *h₂eǵs- 'axle' > (devoicing) *aks- > *ahs- > *ahsō
    • /kʷ/ > */xʷ/ (*hw) — *kʷód 'what' > *hʷód > *hwat
    • Since the second of two obstruents is unaffected, the sequences /sp/, /st/, /sk/, and /skʷ/ remain.[33]
    • The above also forms the Germanic spirant law:[34][11][32]
      • /bt/, /bʰt/, /pt/ > */ɸt/*kh₂ptós 'grabbed' > *kəptós > *həftós > *haftaz 'captive'
      • /gt/, /gʰt/, /kt/ > */xt/*oḱtṓw 'eight' > *oktṓw > *ohtṓw > *ahtōu
      • /gʷt/, /gʷʰt/, /kʷt/ > */xt/*nokʷtm̥ 'night, acc.' > *noktum > *nohtum > *nahtų
  • Voiced plosives are devoiced:[35][32]
    • /b/ > */p/*h₂ébōl 'apple' > *ápōl > *aplaz (reformed as a-stem)
    • /d/ > */t/*h₁dóntm̥ 'tooth, acc.' > *tónþum > *tanþų; *kʷód 'what' > *hʷód > *hwat
    • /g/ > */k/*wérǵom 'work' > *wérgom > *wérkom > *werką
    • /gʷ/ > */kʷ/*gʷémeti '(s)he will step, subj.' > *kʷémeþi > *kwimidi '(s)he comes'
  • Aspirated plosives become voiced plosives or fricatives (see below):[36][11][32]
    • /bʰ/ > */b/ ([b,β]) — *bʰéreti '(s)he is carrying' > *béreþi > *biridi
    • /dʰ/ > */d/ ([d,ð]) — *dʰóh₁mos 'thing put' > *dṓmos > *dōmaz 'judgement'
    • /gʰ/ > */g/ ([g,ɣ]) — *gʰáns 'goose' > *gáns > *gans
    • /gʷʰ/ > */gʷ/ ([gʷ,ɣʷ]) — *sóngʷʰos 'chant' > *sóngʷos > *sangwaz 'song'
The controversial Kluge's law would have taken place around this time:
  • liǵʰ-neh₂- >*lignā- > *likkōn- "lick" [37][11]
Verner's law: voiceless fricatives are voiced, allophonically at first, when they are preceded by an unaccented vowel:[38][11][39]
  • */ɸ/ > [β]*upéri 'over' > *uféri > *ubéri > *ubiri
  • */θ/ > [ð]*tewtéh₂ 'tribe' > *þewþā́ > *þewdā́ > *þeudō
  • */x/ > [ɣ] — {{nowrap|*h₂yuHn̥ḱós 'young' > *yunkós > *yunhós > *yungós > *jungaz (with -z by analogy)
  • */xʷ/ > [ɣʷ]*kʷekʷléh₂ 'wheels (collective)' > *hʷehʷlā́ > *hʷegʷlā́ > *hweulō
  • /s/ > *[z]*h₁régʷeses 'of darkness' > *rékʷeses > *rékʷezez > *rikwiziz; *kʷékʷlos 'wheel' > *hʷéhʷlos > *hʷéhʷloz > *hwehwlaz
  • Some small words that were generally unaccented were also affected — *h₁ésmi, unstressed *h₁esmi 'I am' > *esmi > *ezmi > *immi; *h₁sénti, unstressed *h₁senti 'they are' > *senþi > *sendi > *sindi (the stressed variants, which would have become *ismi and *sinþi, were lost)[40]
All words become stressed on their first syllable. The PIE contrastive accent is lost, phonemicising the voicing distinction created by Verner's law.[41]
The fate of word-initial */gʷ/ is unknown. Kroonen says in this context that */gʷ/ became */w/*gʷʰórmos 'warm' > *gʷórmos > *wórmos > *warmaz 'warm',[37] while Ringe and Stiles say that it became */b/ (gʷʰedyeti >*bidiþi) word-initially. [42][43]
Unstressed /owo/ > */oː/*-owos 'thematic first du.' > *-ōz[44]
Unstressed /ew/ > */ow/ before a consonant or word-finally — *-ews 'u-stem gen. sg.' > *-owz > *-auz[45]
Unstressed */e/ > */i/ except before */r/*-éteh₂ 'abstract noun suffix' > *-eþā > *-iþā > *-iþō[46]
  • Unstressed */ej/ contracts to */iː/*-éys 'i-stem gen. sg.' > *-iys > *-īs > *-īz (with -z by analogy)[47]
  • */e/ before */r/ later becomes */ɑ/ but not until after the application of i-mutation.
  • Some words that could be unstressed as a whole were also affected, often creating stressed/unstressed pairs — *éǵh₂ 'I' > *ek > unstressed *ik (remaining beside stressed *ek)[48]
Unstressed /ji/ > /i/*légʰyeti '(s)he is lying down' ~ *légʰyonti 'they are lying down' > *legyidi ~ *legyondi > *legidi ~ *legyondi > *ligiþi ~ *ligjanþi (with -þ- by analogy)[49]
  • The process creates diphthongs from originally disyllabic sequences — *-oyend 'thematic optative 3pl' > *-oyint > *-oint > *-ain; *áyeri 'in the morning' > *ayiri > *airi 'early'; *tréyes 'three' > *þreyiz > *þreiz > *þrīz
  • The sequence /iji/ becomes /iː/*gʰósteyes 'strangers, nom. pl.' > *gostiyiz > *gostīz > *gastīz 'guests'[50]
Merging of non-high back vowels:
  • /o/, /a/ > /ɑ/*gʰóstis 'stranger' > *gostiz > *gastiz 'guest'; *kápros 'he-goat' > *hafraz[51][52]
  • /oː/, /aː/ > /ɑː/*dʰóh₁mos 'thing put' > *dōmoz > *dāmaz > *dōmaz 'judgement'; *swéh₂dus 'sweet' > *swātuz > *swōtuz[52][47]
  • /oːː/, /aːː/ > /ɑːː/ (â) — *séh₁mō 'seeds' > *sēmô > *sēmâ > *sēmô; *-eh₂es 'eh₂-stem nom. pl.' > *-âz > *-ôz[52]

Late Proto-Germanic

[edit]

By this stage, Germanic had emerged as a distinctive branch and had undergone many of the sound changes that would make its later descendants recognisable as Germanic languages. It had shifted its consonant inventory from a system that was rich in plosives to one containing primarily fricatives, had lost the PIE mobile pitch accent for a predictable stress accent, and had merged two of its vowels. The stress accent had already begun to cause the erosion of unstressed syllables, which would continue in its descendants. The final stage of the language included the remaining development until the breakup into dialects and, most notably, featured the development of nasal vowels and the start of umlaut, another characteristic Germanic feature.

Word-final /m/ > /n/*tóm 'that, acc. masc.' > *þam > *þan 'then'; *-om 'a-stem acc. sg.' > *-am > *-an > *[53]
/m/ > /n/ before dental consonants *ḱm̥tóm 'hundred' > *humdan > *hundan > *hundą; *déḱm̥d 'ten' > *tehumt > *tehunt > *tehun[54]
  • This did not occur before /s/, /z/[40] or /θ/:
    • *mḗmsom 'meat' > *mémsom > *mimzą [40]
    • *ómsos "shoulder" > *amsaz [40]
Word-final /n/ is lost after unstressed syllables, and the preceding vowel is nasalised — *-om 'a-stem acc. sg.' > *-am > *-an > *; *-eh₂m > *-ān > *-ą̄ > *; *-oHom 'genitive plural' > *-ân > *-ą̂ > *-ǫ̂[55]
Nasal /ẽː/ is lowered to /ɑ̃ː/*dʰédʰeh₁m 'I was putting' > *dedēn > *dedę̄ > *dedą̄ > *dedǭ[56]
Elimination of /ə/:
  • Unstressed /ə/ is lost between consonants — *sámh₂dʰos 'sand' > *samədaz > *samdaz; *takéh₁- 'to be silent' > (with added suffix) *takəyónti 'they are silent' > *þagəyanþi > *þagyanþi > *þagjanþi[57]
  • /ə/ > /ɑ/ elsewhere — *ph₂tḗr 'father' > *fədēr > *fadēr; *takéh₁- 'to be silent' > (with added suffix) *takəyéti '(s)he is silent' > *þagəyiþi > *þagəiþi > *þagaiþi[58]
Assimilation of sonorants:
  • /nw/ > /nn/*ténh₂us 'thin' ~ fem. *tn̥h₂éwih₂ > *tn̥h₂ús ~ *tn̥h₂wíh₂ > *þunus ~ *þunwī > *þunus ~ *þunnī > *þunnuz ~ *þunnī[59][60]
  • /ln/ > /ll/*pl̥h₁nós 'full' > *pulənos> *fulənos > *fulnos > *fullos > *fullaz.[61][62] This development postdated contact with the Samic languages, as is shown by the loanword *pulna > Proto-Samic *polnē 'hill(ock), mound'.[63]
  • /zm/ > */mm/*h₁esmi 'I am, unstr.' > *ezmi > *emmi > *immi[40][64]
  • */zl/ > *ll[65]
Loss of word-final /t/ after unstressed syllables — *déḱm̥d 'ten' > *tehunt > *tehun; *bʰéroyd '(s)he would carry, subj.' > *berayt > *berai; *mélid ~ *mélit- 'honey' > *melit ~ *melid- > *meli ~ *melid- > *mili ~ *milid-[66]
*/ɣʷ/ > */w/*snóygʷʰos 'snow' > *snaygʷaz > *snaiwaz; *kʷekʷléh₂ 'wheels (collective)' > *hʷegʷlā > *hʷewlā > *hweulō[67]
  • In at least one example */ɣʷ/ became */ɣ/:
    • *kneygʷʰ- "to bend, droop" > *hneygʷaną > *hnīgʷaną > *hnīganą, *hnīwaną "to bow"[67]
Long a is raised:
  • */ɑː/ > */ɔː/*dʰóh₁mos 'thing put' > *dāmaz > *dōmaz 'judgement'; *swéh₂dus 'sweet' > *swātuz > *swōtuz[47]
  • */ɑːː/ > */ɔːː/*séh₁mō 'seeds' > *sēmâ > *sēmô; *-eh₂es 'eh₂-stem nom. pl.' > *-âz > *-ôz[68]
  • This followed the earliest contact with the Romans since Latin Rōmānī was borrowed as *Rūmānīz and then shifted to *Rūmōnīz.[68]
Early i-mutation: /e/ > /i/ when followed by /i/ or /j/ in the same or next syllable — *bʰéreti '(s)he is carrying' > *beridi > *biridi; *médʰyos 'middle' > *medyaz > *midjaz; *néwios 'new' > *newyaz > *niwjaz
  • This eliminates the remaining /ei/, changing it to /iː/*deywós 'god' > *teiwaz- (attested as *teiva- in the Negau helmet) > *Tīwaz 'Týr'; *tréyes 'three' > *þreiz > *þrīz[47]
  • A number of loanwords in the Finnic and Samic demonstrate earlier *e, e.g.
    • Finnish teljo 'thwart', from early Proto-Germanic *þeljō (later *þiljō)
    • Finnish menninkäinen 'goblin', from early Proto-Germanic *menþingō (later *minþingō)
    • Northern Sami deahkki 'thick meat', from early Proto-Germanic *þekkwiz 'thick' (later *þikkwiz)[63]
    • Northern Sami jievja 'white (of animal, or hair)', from early Proto-Germanic *hewją (later *hiwją)
/e/ > /i/ when followed by a syllable-final nasal — *en 'in' > *in; *séngʷʰeti '(s)he chants' > *sengʷidi > *singwidi '(s)he sings' [69][70]
  • Finnic loanwords demonstrating earlier *e are again known: Finnish rengas 'ring', from early Proto-Germanic *hrengaz (later *hringaz)[71]
/j/ is lost between vowels except after /i/ (but it is lost after syllabic /u/). The two vowels that come to stand in hiatus then contract to long vowels or diphthongs — *-oyh₁m̥ 'thematic optative 1sg sg.' > *-oyum > *-ayų > *-aų; *h₂eyeri 'in the morning' > *ayiri > *airi 'early'[72]
  • This process creates a new /ɑː/ from earlier /ɑjɑ/*steh₂- 'to stand' > (with suffix added) *sth₂yónti 'they stand' > *stayanþi > *stānþi[73]
/n/ is lost before /x/, causing compensatory lengthening and nasalisation of the preceding vowel — *ḱónketi '(s)he hangs' > *hanhidi (phonetically *[ˈxɑ̃ːxiði])[74]

Grammatical development

[edit]

The evolution of Proto-Germanic grammar is complex, however, the following changes applied to all grammatical categories:

  • The dual was lost in all forms except for pronouns, and in words for "two" and "both" [75][76]

Verbs

[edit]
  • The functions of third person dual forms were taken over by the third person plural forms. [77]
  • Stative perfects are reinterpreted as "resultative"[78] (Preterite-presents, however, continue the old stative meaning.)[79] and as a result of the reinterpretation, it and the aorist indicative came into conflict, which led to the latter being lost.[80]
  • Almost all Proto-Indo-European imperfects were lost. [81]
  • The subjunctive mood merged into the indicative.[82]

Nominals

[edit]

Nouns

[edit]

Pronouns

[edit]

Adjectives

[edit]
  • Adjectives gained a second declension called "weak" declension which was identical to an- and ōn-stems. [85]

Other

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ a b Kroonen believes that in situations where RH is word initial, the laryngeal, not the resonant, is syllabic.[7]
  2. ^ Kroonen believes that there are situations where it is difficult to tell where which sequence a specific *a was shortened from, because it could come from one of three separate situations.[27]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Ringe 2017, p. 15.
  2. ^ Kroonen 2013, pp. xvii–xviii, xxii.
  3. ^ Ringe 2017, pp. 107–110.
  4. ^ Ringe 2017, pp. 100–101.
  5. ^ Stiles 2017, pp. 899–900.
  6. ^ a b Kroonen 2013, p. xx.
  7. ^ Kroonen 2013 "An important issue concerns roots with *a < *H̥. that start with a resonant. It is widely assumed that the resonant rather than the laryngeal is vocalized in such roots (cf. Schaffner 2001; Müller 2007), but this is in disagreement with the facts (cf. Beekes 1988)"
  8. ^ Ringe 2017, p. 20.
  9. ^ a b Stiles 2017, p. 896.
  10. ^ a b Ringe 2017, p. 106.
  11. ^ a b c d e f Kroonen & Hansen 2022, p. 153.
  12. ^ a b Ringe 2017, p. 92-93.
  13. ^ Ringe 2017, p. 88.
  14. ^ Stiles 2017, p. 898.
  15. ^ Ringe 2017, p. 88-90.
  16. ^ Ringe 2017, p. 90.
  17. ^ Ringe 2017, p. 90-91.
  18. ^ Ringe 2017, p. 91-93.
  19. ^ Ringe 2017, p. 86-88.
  20. ^ Ringe 2017, p. 98.
  21. ^ Kroonen 2013, pp. xvii–xviii.
  22. ^ Ringe 2017, pp. 110–111.
  23. ^ Ringe 2017, pp. 111–113.
  24. ^ Stiles 2017, p. 895.
  25. ^ Ringe 2017, p. 94-96.
  26. ^ Kroonen 2013, pp. xxiv–xxvi.
  27. ^ Kroonen 2013, p. xvii "As a consequence of [Dybo's] law (for which see §2.1.2), the vocalization of *H to *a is technically unfalsifiable before resonants, because the *a can always have developed out of unstressed *eh₂/₃, *oH or *ō in this position. Nonetheless, the vocalization *H before resonants can be ascertained on the basis of formations in which it is morphologically unlikely that the root had a full grade, such as, for instance, the PIE no-participles."
  28. ^ Ringe 2017, p. 141.
  29. ^ Ringe 2017, pp. 141–142.
  30. ^ a b Ringe 2017, p. 142.
  31. ^ Ringe 2017, p. 114-116.
  32. ^ a b c d Stiles 2017, p. 890.
  33. ^ Ringe 2017, p. 117.
  34. ^ Ringe 2017, p. 116-117.
  35. ^ Ringe 2017, pp. 118–120.
  36. ^ Ringe 2017, pp. 120–122.
  37. ^ a b Kroonen 2013, pp. xxvii–xxix.
  38. ^ Ringe 2017, pp. 122–124.
  39. ^ Stiles 2017, pp. 890–891.
  40. ^ a b c d e Ringe 2017, p. 166.
  41. ^ Ringe 2017, p. 126.
  42. ^ Ringe 2017, p. 127-128: "In word initial position PIE gʷʰ became [Proto-Germanic] */b/, except where it had been delabialized by a following */u/"
  43. ^ Stiles 2017, p. 895 "
  44. ^ Ringe 2017, p. 161-162.
  45. ^ Ringe 2017, pp. 149–150.
  46. ^ Ringe 2017, pp. 147–149.
  47. ^ a b c d Kroonen 2013, p. xxii. Cite error: The named reference "FOOTNOTEKroonen2013xxii" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  48. ^ Ringe 2017, p. 147-14.
  49. ^ Ringe 2017, pp. 154–155.
  50. ^ Ringe 2017, p. 156.
  51. ^ Kroonen 2013, pp. xvii–xix.
  52. ^ a b c Ringe 2017, p. 170-171.
  53. ^ Ringe 2017, p. 104.
  54. ^ Ringe 2017, p. 165-166.
  55. ^ Ringe 2017, p. 104-106.
  56. ^ Ringe 2017, p. 172-173.
  57. ^ Ringe 2017, pp. 163–164.
  58. ^ Ringe 2017, pp. 98–99.
  59. ^ Ringe 2017, p. 164-165.
  60. ^ Kroonen 2013, pp. xxxvii–xxxviii.
  61. ^ Ringe 2017, p. 165.
  62. ^ Kroonen 2013, p. xxxv.
  63. ^ a b Aikio, Ante (2006). "On Germanic-Saami contacts and Saami prehistory". Suomalais-Ugrilaisen Seuran Aikakauskirja. 91: 9–55.
  64. ^ Kroonen 2013, pp. xxxvi–xxxvii.
  65. ^ Kroonen 2013, p. xxxvii.
  66. ^ Ringe 2017, p. 167-168.
  67. ^ a b Ringe 2017, p. 129.
  68. ^ a b Ringe 2017, p. 171.
  69. ^ Ringe 2017, pp. 173–174.
  70. ^ Kroonen 2013, p. xix.
  71. ^ Ringe 2017, p. 174.
  72. ^ Ringe 2017, p. 159-161.
  73. ^ Ringe 2017, p. 160.
  74. ^ Ringe 2017, p. 174-175.
  75. ^ Ringe 2017, p. 196-197.
  76. ^ Harðarson 2017, p. 913.
  77. ^ Ringe 2017, p. 196.
  78. ^ Ringe 2017, p. 179-181.
  79. ^ Ringe 2017, p. 177-178.
  80. ^ Ringe 2017, pp. 181–182.
  81. ^ Ringe 2017, p. 182.
  82. ^ Ringe 2017, pp. 185–186.
  83. ^ Ringe 2017, pp. 196–7.
  84. ^ Ringe 2017, pp. 197–198.
  85. ^ Ringe 2017, p. 194-196.

Sources

[edit]