User:Kanemura Miku/Evaluate an Article
Evaluate an article[edit]
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.
- Name of article: Akira (1988 film)
- It is an old but famous anime movie in the 20th century Japan.
Lead[edit]
- Guiding questions
- The Lead includes an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic.
- The Lead includes a brief description of the article's major sections.
- The Lead does not include information that is not present in the article.
- The Lead is a little bit too detailed.
Lead evaluation[edit]
Content[edit]
- Guiding questions
- The is article's content relevant to the topic.
- The content is up-to-date.
- There is no content that is missing or content that does not belong.
Content evaluation[edit]
Tone and Balance[edit]
- Guiding questions
- The article is neutral.
- There aren't any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position.
- There aren't any viewpoints that are overepresented, or underrepresented?
- The article does not attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
Tone and balance evaluation[edit]
Sources and References[edit]
- Guiding questions
- All facts in the article are backed up by a reliable secondary source of information.
- The sources reflect the available literature on the topic.
- The sources are current.
- The links down below work perfectly.
Sources and references evaluation[edit]
Organization[edit]
- Guiding questions
- The article is well-written. It is very concise, clear, and easy to read.
- The article has no any grammatical or spelling errors.
- The article is very well-organized. It's broken down to proper sections.
Organization evaluation[edit]
Images and Media[edit]
- Guiding questions
- The article includes images that enhance understanding of the topic.
- Images are well-captioned.
- All images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations.
- The images are laid out in a visually appealing way.
Images and media evaluation[edit]
Checking the talk page[edit]
- Guiding questions
- The conversation on the talk page includes adding new sections, content changes and external links modification.
- The article is rated as a level-5 vital article.
- One of the editors does believe that the main character of Akira represents the anti-government movement at that time.
Talk page evaluation[edit]
Overall impressions[edit]
- Guiding questions
- The article itself is very well-edited.
- It contains a lot of necessary information.
- I do feel like the plot section is too long so maybe cut it a little bit.
- Overall, it is a well-developed article.