User:Kristaa68
Kristaa68 | |
---|---|
![]() Part A Sample | |
MeSH | D014145 |
The Trail-making test is a neuropsychological test of visual attention and task switching. It consists of two parts in which the subject is instructed to connect a set of 25 dots as fast as possible while still maintaining accuracy[1]. It can provide information about visual search speed, scanning, speed of processing, mental flexibility, as well as executive functioning[1]. It is also sensitive to detecting several cognitive impairments such as Alzheimer's Disease and Dementia[2].
History
[edit]The test was initially used in 1944 for assessing general intelligence (and was part of the Army Individual Test of General Ability) [2]. In 1985 it was incorporated into the Halsted-Reitan battery [2]. The Trail-Making test is now commonly used as a diagnostic tool in clinical settings. Poor performance is known to be associated with many types of brain impairment; in particular frontal lobe lesions.
Method and Interpretation
[edit]The task requires a subject to 'connect-the-dots' of 25 consecutive targets on a sheet of paper or computer screen. There are two parts to the test: A, in which the targets are all numbers (1,2,3, etc.)and the test taker needs to connect them in sequential order, and B, in which the subject alternates between numbers and letters (1, A, 2, B, etc.)[3]. If the subject makes an error, the test administrator is to correct them before the subject moves on to the next dot[3].
The goal of the test is for the subject is to finish the part A and part B as quickly as possible, the time taken to complete the test is used as the primary performance metric. Error rate is not recorded in the paper and pencil version of the test, however, it is assumed that if errors are made it will be reflected in the completion time[2]. Test B, in which the subject alternates between numbers and letters, is used to examine executive functioning[2]. Part A is used primarily to examine cognitive processing speed[2].
References
[edit]- ^ a b Arnett, James A. (1995). "Effect of physical layout in performance of the Trail Making Test". Psychological Assessment. 7 (2): 220–221. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.2.220. ProQuest 614331919. Retrieved 2012-02-22.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ a b c d e f Tombaugh, T.N.T.N (2004). "Trail Making test A and B: Normative Data Stratified by Age and Education". Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology : The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists. 19 (2): 203–214. doi:10.1016/S0887-6177(03)00039-8. PMID 15010086. ProQuest 71715116. Retrieved 2012-01-10.
- ^ a b Bowie, C.R.C.R (2006). "Administration and interpretation of the trail making test". Nature Protocols. 1 (5): 2277–2281. doi:10.1038/nprot.2006.390. PMID 17406468. ProQuest 68327018. Retrieved 2012-01-10.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help)
- Reitan R. M. (1958). Validity of the Trail Making test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Percept. Mot Skills, 8, 271-276.
- Corrigan, J. D., Hinkeldey, M. S. (1987). Relationships between parts A and B of the Trail Making Test. J. Clin Psychol, 43 (4), 402–409.
- Gaudino, E. A., Geisler, M. W., Squires, N. K. (1995). Construct validity in the Trail Making Test: What makes Part B harder? J Clin Exp Neuropsychol, 17 (4), 529-535.
External links
[edit]- PEBL Test Battery A free computer-based research-oriented implementation of the trail-making test is available as part of the